BAP
Price
$256.80
Change
-$1.13 (-0.44%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
CRARF
Price
$18.64
Change
-$0.37 (-1.95%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Capitalization
57.5B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs CRARF

Header iconBAP vs CRARF Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs CRARFBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$256.80
Change-$1.13 (-0.44%)
Volume$131.09K
Capitalization20.38B
Credit Agricole SA
Price$18.64
Change-$0.37 (-1.95%)
Volume$128
Capitalization57.5B
BAP vs CRARF Comparison Chart in %
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. CRARF commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a StrongBuy and CRARF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BAP: $256.80 vs. CRARF: $18.64)
Brand notoriety: BAP and CRARF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 39% vs. CRARF: 19%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $20.38B vs. CRARF: $57.5B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.38B. CRARF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $57.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCRARF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CRARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the long-term than CRARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRARF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CRARF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the short-term than CRARF.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while CRARF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +7.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+7.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRARF($57.5B) has a higher market cap than BAP($20.4B). BAP has higher P/E ratio than CRARF: BAP (11.36) vs CRARF (6.90). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 56.657 vs. CRARF (33.237). BAP has less debt than CRARF: BAP (23.3B) vs CRARF (313B). CRARF has higher revenues than BAP: CRARF (25.8B) vs BAP (22.6B).
BAPCRARFBAP / CRARF
Capitalization20.4B57.5B35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD56.65733.237170%
P/E Ratio11.366.90165%
Revenue22.6B25.8B88%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt23.3B313B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs CRARF: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
CRARF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1140
SMR RATING
1..100
4100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAP's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CRARF (79) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to CRARF’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CRARF (40) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to CRARF’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's SMR Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRARF (100) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew significantly faster than CRARF’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CRARF (56) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to CRARF’s over the last 12 months.

CRARF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CRARF’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPCRARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSAT31.320.54
+1.75%
Telesat Corp
CCG1.01N/A
N/A
Cheche Group
PAA16.76-0.06
-0.36%
Plains All American Pipeline LP
MQ4.72-0.03
-0.63%
Marqeta
NITO3.73-0.36
-8.80%
N2OFF Inc

CRARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRARF and BNPQY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRARF and BNPQY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRARF
1D Price
Change %
CRARF100%
N/A
BNPQY - CRARF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
BNPQF - CRARF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
MDIBY - CRARF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
NRDBY - CRARF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
BAP - CRARF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More