Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATAX vs LMLCX
BATAX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts BATAX vs LMLCX
BlackRock Allc Trgt Sctzd TR
Price$9.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.37B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.29
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets360.03M
BATAX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATAX vs. LMLCX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATAX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATAX has more cash in the bank: 4.37B vs. LMLCX (360M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than BATAX: LMLCX (6.33) vs BATAX (5.98). BATAX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: BATAX (10 years) vs LMLCX (19 years). BATAX (0.04) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). BATAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). BATAX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BATAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.36 vs. LMLCX (6.31). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.03 vs. BATAX (23.22).
| BATAX | LMLCX | BATAX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.008 | 12.467 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.37B | 360M | 1,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.98 | 6.33 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.36 | 6.31 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.66 | 31.94 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.22 | 27.03 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.59 | 51.57 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers