Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATAX vs LMLCX
BATAX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts BATAX vs LMLCX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shrs Ser A
Price$9.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.17B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371.4M
BATAX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATAX vs. LMLCX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATAX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATAX has more cash in the bank: 4.17B vs. LMLCX (371M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than BATAX: LMLCX (6.47) vs BATAX (6.03). BATAX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: BATAX (10 years) vs LMLCX (19 years). BATAX (0.04) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). BATAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). BATAX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BATAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. LMLCX (2.91). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.03 vs. BATAX (22.82).
| BATAX | LMLCX | BATAX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.394 | 11.392 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.17B | 371M | 1,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.03 | 6.47 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 2.91 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.01 | 26.56 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.82 | 26.03 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers