Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
Volume$300
Net Assets80.25M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$25.38
Change+$0.32 (+1.28%)
Volume$470
Net Assets8.08M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 80.3M vs. DMAT (8.08M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (80.973) vs BATT (51.364). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 51.364 | 80.973 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 80.3M | 8.08M | 994% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.16 | 0.94 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 89% | 19 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.32% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +23.01% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.32% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.53% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 8% Poorly correlated | +14.66% | ||
| LAR - DMAT | 8% Poorly correlated | +7.02% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
More | ||||