Ad is loading...
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change+$0.19 (+2.16%)
Volume$35.37K
Net Assets63.6M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$14.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.93M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 63.6M vs. DMAT (4.93M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (3.255) vs BATT (1.989). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (3 years). BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (36.55) vs DMAT (36.55).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.989 | 3.255 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 63.6M | 4.93M | 1,290% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 36.55 | 115% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 1.88 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 24 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 24 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 24 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 24 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 24 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 25 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 30 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 24 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.10% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 75% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.13% | ||
More | ||||