Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.83
Change-$0.10 (-1.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets59.14M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$15.78
Change-$0.13 (-0.82%)
Volume$400
Net Assets3.53M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 59.1M vs. DMAT (3.53M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (12.173) vs BATT (1.477). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (3 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.477 | 12.173 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 59.1M | 3.53M | 1,676% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 1.00 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.90% | ||
More | ||||