Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.63
Change+$0.14 (+1.22%)
Volume$21.95K
Net Assets68.43M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$21.69
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
Volume$4.45K
Net Assets6.75M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and DMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.4M vs. DMAT (6.75M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (54.747) vs BATT (32.159). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 32.159 | 54.747 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 68.4M | 6.75M | 1,013% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 1.09 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| LAR - DMAT | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.75% | ||
More | ||||