Ad is loading...
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.02
Change-$0.35 (-3.74%)
Volume$192
CapitalizationN/A
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$14.31
Change-$0.70 (-4.66%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 69.8M vs. DMAT (5.08M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (-2.059) vs BATT (-11.111). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (3 years). BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (36.55) vs DMAT (36.55).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | -11.111 | -2.059 | 540% |
| Net Assets | 69.8M | 5.08M | 1,373% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 36.55 | 115% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 1.88 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -6.99% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| XPEV - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
More | ||||