Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$37.48K
Net Assets65.89M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$19.79
Change+$0.35 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.5M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and DMAT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 65.9M vs. DMAT (4.5M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (38.700) vs BATT (21.932). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 21.932 | 38.700 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 65.9M | 4.5M | 1,463% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 1.26 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +13.27% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| HXL - DMAT | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.76% | ||
More | ||||