Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$12.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.63%)
Volume$43.82K
Net Assets87.33M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$23.39
Change-$0.39 (-1.64%)
Volume$6.27K
Net Assets11.15M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 87.3M vs. DMAT (11.1M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (66.918) vs BATT (42.614). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 42.614 | 66.918 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 87.3M | 11.1M | 786% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 0.93 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| AMG - BATT | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||