Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs FTAG
BATT vs FTAG Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs FTAG
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$12.57
Change-$0.53 (-4.05%)
Volume$184
Net Assets88.9M
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
Price$25.25
Change-$0.21 (-0.82%)
Volume$114
Net Assets6.09M
BATT vs FTAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. FTAG commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and FTAG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 88.9M vs. FTAG (6.1M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than FTAG: BATT (43.523) vs FTAG (9.631). BATT was incepted earlier than FTAG: BATT (7 years) vs FTAG (16 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than FTAG (0.70). BATT has a higher turnover FTAG (11.00) vs FTAG (11.00).
| BATT | FTAG | BATT / FTAG | |
| Gain YTD | 43.523 | 9.631 | 452% |
| Net Assets | 88.9M | 6.1M | 1,459% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 11.00 | 627% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 2.48 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | FTAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -3.59% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -7.37% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.09% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -9.60% | ||
| AMG - BATT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
FTAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTAG has been loosely correlated with ASIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTAG jumps, then ASIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTAG | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| ASIX - FTAG | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LXU - FTAG | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
| CMP - FTAG | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| UAN - FTAG | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| FMC - FTAG | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.02% | ||
More | ||||