Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.09
Change+$0.11 (+0.85%)
Volume$100
Net Assets90.77M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$32.09
Change+$0.37 (+1.17%)
Volume$155
Net Assets24.04M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and GMET is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 90.8M vs. GMET (24M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (52.259) vs BATT (47.500). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 47.500 | 52.259 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 90.8M | 24M | 378% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 20.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 1.22 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| AMG - BATT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SQM have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.14% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 18% Poorly correlated | -3.27% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||