Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.54%)
Volume$19.04K
Net Assets67.14M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$26.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.64K
Net Assets21.4M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and GMET is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 67.1M vs. GMET (21.4M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (27.268) vs BATT (25.114). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 25.114 | 27.268 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 67.1M | 21.4M | 314% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 20.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 1.63 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +7.54% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | +11.46% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SQM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 12% Poorly correlated | +7.54% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 10% Poorly correlated | +11.46% | ||
| AMS - GMET | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||