Ad is loading...
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$7.97
Change-$0.39 (-4.67%)
Volume$29.07K
Net Assets56.35M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$19.61
Change-$1.29 (-6.17%)
Volume$390
Net Assets16.84M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and GMET is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 56.4M vs. GMET (16.8M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (0.355) vs BATT (-9.432). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than GMET (0.66). BATT has a higher turnover GMET (28.00) vs GMET (28.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | -9.432 | 0.355 | -2,655% |
| Net Assets | 56.4M | 16.8M | 336% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.66 | 89% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 28.00 | 150% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 1.88 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -4.67% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.96% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -9.88% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MP - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| SCCO - GMET | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
More | ||||