Ad is loading...
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.11
Change+$0.12 (+1.33%)
Volume$161
CapitalizationN/A
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$21.65
Change+$0.26 (+1.22%)
Volume$7.42K
CapitalizationN/A
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and GMET is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68M vs. GMET (18.5M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (-11.013) vs BATT (-13.577). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (3 years). BATT has a higher turnover GMET (28.00) vs GMET (28.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | -13.577 | -11.013 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 68M | 18.5M | 368% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 28.00 | 150% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 2.04 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 21 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.33% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| XPEV - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| MP - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.10% | ||
| SCCO - GMET | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||