Ad is loading...
BATT vs ICOP
BATT vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ICOP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
Volume$44.29K
Net Assets66.63M
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$26.62
Change+$0.14 (+0.53%)
Volume$593.39K
Net Assets33.32M
BATT vs ICOP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ICOP commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and ICOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 66.6M vs. ICOP (33.3M). ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: ICOP (4.310) vs BATT (3.523). BATT was incepted earlier than ICOP: BATT (7 years) vs ICOP (2 years). BATT has a higher turnover ICOP (31.00) vs ICOP (31.00).
| BATT | ICOP | BATT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | 3.523 | 4.310 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 66.6M | 33.3M | 200% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 31.00 | 135% |
| Yield | 3.61 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 20 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.81% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| FCX - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| SCCO - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| HBM - ICOP | 84% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| ERO - ICOP | 79% Closely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 74% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||