Ad is loading...
BATT vs ICOP
BATT vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ICOP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.22
Change-$0.07 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.52M
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$26.66
Change-$0.27 (-1.00%)
Volume$300
Net Assets51.08M
BATT vs ICOP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ICOP commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and ICOP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 55.5M vs. ICOP (51.1M). ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: ICOP (5.525) vs BATT (-5.795). BATT was incepted earlier than ICOP: BATT (7 years) vs ICOP (2 years). ICOP (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). ICOP has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | ICOP | BATT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | -5.795 | 5.525 | -105% |
| Net Assets | 55.5M | 51.1M | 109% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 55.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 1.84 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 21 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 74% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -4.94% | ||
More | ||||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| FCX - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| SCCO - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| HBM - ICOP | 84% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| ERO - ICOP | 79% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 74% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
More | ||||