Ad is loading...
BATT vs ICOP
BATT vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ICOP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.02
Change-$0.35 (-3.74%)
Volume$192
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$25.53
Change-$1.16 (-4.35%)
Volume$2.87K
CapitalizationN/A
BATT vs ICOP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ICOP commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and ICOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 69.8M vs. ICOP (30.6M). ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: ICOP (5.732) vs BATT (-11.111). BATT was incepted earlier than ICOP: BATT (7 years) vs ICOP (1 year). BATT has a higher turnover ICOP (31.00) vs ICOP (31.00).
| BATT | ICOP | BATT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | -11.111 | 5.732 | -194% |
| Net Assets | 69.8M | 30.6M | 228% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 31.00 | 135% |
| Yield | 3.61 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 20 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -6.99% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| XPEV - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| FCX - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| SCCO - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| HBM - ICOP | 84% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| ERO - ICOP | 79% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 74% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||