Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs ICOP
BATT vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ICOP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.09
Change+$0.11 (+0.85%)
Volume$100
Net Assets90.77M
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$37.75
Change+$0.44 (+1.18%)
Volume$260
Net Assets102.02M
BATT vs ICOP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ICOP commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and ICOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICOP has more net assets: 102M vs. BATT (90.8M). ICOP (47.703) and BATT (47.500) have matching annual dividend yield . BATT was incepted earlier than ICOP: BATT (7 years) vs ICOP (2 years). ICOP (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover ICOP (37.00) vs ICOP (37.00).
| BATT | ICOP | BATT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | 47.500 | 47.703 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 90.8M | 102M | 89% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 37.00 | 186% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 1.88 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| AMG - BATT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -1.29% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 80% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.98% |