Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs ILIT
BATT vs ILIT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ILIT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.54%)
Volume$19.04K
Net Assets67.14M
iShares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
Price$10.36
Change+$0.18 (+1.77%)
Volume$2.08K
Net Assets5.63M
BATT vs ILIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ILIT commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and ILIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 67.1M vs. ILIT (5.63M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than ILIT: BATT (25.114) vs ILIT (17.962). BATT was incepted earlier than ILIT: BATT (7 years) vs ILIT (2 years). ILIT (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). ILIT has a higher turnover BATT (69.00) vs BATT (69.00).
| BATT | ILIT | BATT / ILIT | |
| Gain YTD | 25.114 | 17.962 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 67.1M | 5.63M | 1,192% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 73.00 | 95% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 6.41 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ILIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +7.54% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | +11.46% | ||
More | ||||
ILIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ILIT and LAR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILIT and LAR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILIT | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| LAR - ILIT | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| ALB - ILIT | 24% Poorly correlated | +7.54% | ||
| SQM - ILIT | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
| SGML - ILIT | 17% Poorly correlated | +11.46% | ||
| LAC - ILIT | 9% Poorly correlated | +3.47% | ||
More | ||||