Ad is loading...
BATT vs ILIT
BATT vs ILIT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ILIT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.24
Change+$0.17 (+2.11%)
Volume$500
Net Assets54.1M
iShares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
Price$7.78
Change+$0.30 (+4.01%)
Volume$106
Net Assets3.35M
BATT vs ILIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ILIT commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and ILIT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 54.1M vs. ILIT (3.35M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than ILIT: BATT (-8.295) vs ILIT (-11.977). BATT was incepted earlier than ILIT: BATT (7 years) vs ILIT (2 years). ILIT (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). ILIT has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | ILIT | BATT / ILIT | |
| Gain YTD | -8.295 | -11.977 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 54.1M | 3.35M | 1,615% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 48.00 | 88% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 7.05 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ILIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.67% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 74% Closely correlated | +3.32% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 67% Closely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
ILIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILIT | 100% | +4.14% | ||
| SQM - ILIT | 79% Closely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| ALB - ILIT | 77% Closely correlated | +4.55% | ||
| PLL - ILIT | 70% Closely correlated | +24.62% | ||
| LAR - ILIT | 68% Closely correlated | +7.54% | ||
| LAC - ILIT | 59% Loosely correlated | +7.25% | ||
More | ||||