Ad is loading...
BATT vs LIT
BATT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LIT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change-$0.14 (-1.54%)
Volume$19.96K
Net Assets63.44M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.59
Change-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Volume$248.65K
Net Assets1.07B
BATT vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LIT commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and LIT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.07B vs. BATT (63.4M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: LIT (4.438) vs BATT (1.932). BATT was incepted earlier than LIT: BATT (7 years) vs LIT (15 years). BATT has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| BATT | LIT | BATT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.932 | 4.438 | 44% |
| Net Assets | 63.4M | 1.07B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 19.76 | 213% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 1.25 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.52% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||