Ad is loading...
BATT vs LIT
BATT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LIT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.59%)
Volume$118
CapitalizationN/A
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
BATT vs. LIT commentary
Sep 16, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and LIT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.14B vs. BATT (69.1M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: BATT (-19.976) vs LIT (-26.634). BATT was incepted earlier than LIT: BATT (6 years) vs LIT (14 years). BATT has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| BATT | LIT | BATT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | -19.976 | -26.634 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 69.1M | 1.14B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 19.76 | 213% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 1.25 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +5.11% | ||
More | ||||