Ad is loading...
BATT vs LIT
BATT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LIT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$7.97
Change-$0.39 (-4.67%)
Volume$29.07K
Net Assets56.35M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$37.07
Change-$1.55 (-4.01%)
Volume$226.7K
Net Assets907.2M
BATT vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LIT commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 907M vs. BATT (56.4M). LIT (-9.098) and BATT (-9.432) have matching annual dividend yield . BATT was incepted earlier than LIT: BATT (7 years) vs LIT (15 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). BATT has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| BATT | LIT | BATT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | -9.432 | -9.098 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 56.4M | 907M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 22.87 | 184% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 0.98 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -4.67% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.96% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -9.88% | ||
More | ||||