Ad is loading...
BATT vs NDIV
BATT vs NDIV Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NDIV
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.41
Change+$0.05 (+0.60%)
Volume$1.31K
Net Assets54.68M
Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF
Price$26.54
Change+$0.65 (+2.51%)
Volume$5.29K
Net Assets11.65M
BATT vs NDIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NDIV commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and NDIV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 54.7M vs. NDIV (11.7M). NDIV has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: NDIV (-2.349) vs BATT (-5.000). BATT was incepted earlier than NDIV: BATT (7 years) vs NDIV (3 years). BATT (0.59) and NDIV (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . NDIV has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | NDIV | BATT / NDIV | |
| Gain YTD | -5.000 | -2.349 | 213% |
| Net Assets | 54.7M | 11.7M | 468% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 106.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 3.39 | 5.99 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 67% Closely correlated | +5.55% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
More | ||||
NDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDIV has been closely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDIV jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDIV | 100% | +2.52% | ||
| KRP - NDIV | 77% Closely correlated | +7.58% | ||
| BSM - NDIV | 76% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| USAC - NDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| VRN - NDIV | 69% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| TROX - NDIV | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.28% | ||
More | ||||