Ad is loading...
BATT vs NDIV
BATT vs NDIV Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NDIV
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$7.40
Change-$0.11 (-1.46%)
Volume$335
Net Assets49.14M
Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF
Price$24.80
Change-$1.11 (-4.28%)
Volume$9.65K
Net Assets11.67M
BATT vs NDIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NDIV commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and NDIV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 49.1M vs. NDIV (11.7M). NDIV has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: NDIV (-9.139) vs BATT (-14.659). BATT was incepted earlier than NDIV: BATT (7 years) vs NDIV (3 years). BATT (0.59) and NDIV (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . NDIV has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | NDIV | BATT / NDIV | |
| Gain YTD | -14.659 | -9.139 | 160% |
| Net Assets | 49.1M | 11.7M | 420% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 106.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 5.56 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +9.00% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 73% Closely correlated | +15.51% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +12.31% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +17.08% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +14.12% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +10.49% | ||
More | ||||
NDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDIV has been closely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDIV jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDIV | 100% | -4.31% | ||
| KRP - NDIV | 76% Closely correlated | -5.46% | ||
| BSM - NDIV | 74% Closely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| USAC - NDIV | 68% Closely correlated | -4.93% | ||
| VRN - NDIV | 66% Closely correlated | -6.97% | ||
| GLNCY - NDIV | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.95% | ||
More | ||||