Ad is loading...
BATT vs NDIV
BATT vs NDIV Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NDIV
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.83
Change-$0.15 (-1.67%)
Volume$100
Net Assets63.6M
Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF
Price$29.06
Change-$0.33 (-1.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets13.23M
BATT vs NDIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NDIV commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and NDIV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 63.6M vs. NDIV (13.2M). NDIV has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: NDIV (6.716) vs BATT (1.989). BATT was incepted earlier than NDIV: BATT (7 years) vs NDIV (2 years). NDIV has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | NDIV | BATT / NDIV | |
| Gain YTD | 1.989 | 6.716 | 30% |
| Net Assets | 63.6M | 13.2M | 482% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 135.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 7.07 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | NDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.10% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
More | ||||
NDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDIV has been loosely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDIV jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDIV | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| GLNCY - NDIV | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.40% | ||
| GFI - NDIV | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.16% | ||
| TX - NDIV | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| PPL - NDIV | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
| SQM - NDIV | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||