Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs NDIV
BATT vs NDIV Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NDIV
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.49
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
Volume$63.37K
Net Assets68.82M
Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF
Price$28.97
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Volume$2.1K
Net Assets12.27M
BATT vs NDIV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NDIV commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and NDIV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.8M vs. NDIV (12.3M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than NDIV: BATT (19.205) vs NDIV (7.580). BATT was incepted earlier than NDIV: BATT (7 years) vs NDIV (3 years). BATT (0.59) and NDIV (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . NDIV has a higher turnover BATT (69.00) vs BATT (69.00).
| BATT | NDIV | BATT / NDIV | |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 7.580 | 253% |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 12.3M | 559% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 106.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 5.63 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | NDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 25 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
NDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDIV has been closely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDIV jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDIV | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| KRP - NDIV | 75% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| BSM - NDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| USAC - NDIV | 70% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| TROX - NDIV | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| DMLP - NDIV | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||