Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs NDIV
BATT vs NDIV Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NDIV
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.94
Change+$0.06 (+0.68%)
Volume$132
Net Assets57.29M
Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF
Price$27.67
Change+$0.46 (+1.69%)
Volume$144
Net Assets11.57M
BATT vs NDIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NDIV commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and NDIV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 57.3M vs. NDIV (11.6M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than NDIV: BATT (0.909) vs NDIV (0.556). BATT was incepted earlier than NDIV: BATT (7 years) vs NDIV (3 years). BATT (0.59) and NDIV (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . NDIV has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | NDIV | BATT / NDIV | |
| Gain YTD | 0.909 | 0.556 | 163% |
| Net Assets | 57.3M | 11.6M | 494% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 106.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 5.84 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||
NDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDIV has been closely correlated with BSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDIV jumps, then BSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDIV | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BSM - NDIV | 77% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| KRP - NDIV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| USAC - NDIV | 72% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| VRN - NDIV | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DMLP - NDIV | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
More | ||||