BATT | NIKL | BATT / NIKL | |
Gain YTD | -5.341 | -10.798 | 49% |
Net Assets | 59.7M | 8.46M | 706% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 42.00 | 55.00 | 76% |
Yield | 3.61 | 21.02 | 17% |
Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
BATT | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BATT | 100% | -0.95% | ||
SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +4.56% | ||
BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.16% | ||
NIO - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NIKL and LZM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIKL and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NIKL | 100% | +1.28% | ||
LZM - NIKL | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.58% | ||
NIC - NIKL | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.13% | ||
S - NIKL | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
RDN - NIKL | 12% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
CNC - NIKL | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
More |