Ad is loading...
BATT vs NIKL
BATT vs NIKL Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NIKL
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$7.68
Change+$0.31 (+4.21%)
Volume$7.54K
Net Assets50.16M
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
Price$8.15
Change+$0.32 (+4.09%)
Volume$22.01K
Net Assets10.22M
BATT vs NIKL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NIKL commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and NIKL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 50.2M vs. NIKL (10.2M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than NIKL: BATT (-12.673) vs NIKL (-23.454). BATT was incepted earlier than NIKL: BATT (7 years) vs NIKL (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than NIKL (0.75). NIKL has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | NIKL | BATT / NIKL | |
| Gain YTD | -12.673 | -23.454 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 50.2M | 10.2M | 492% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 55.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 4.15 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +4.22% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 74% Closely correlated | +6.38% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +4.50% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +5.83% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +4.80% | ||
More | ||||
NIKL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIKL has been loosely correlated with LZM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NIKL jumps, then LZM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIKL | 100% | +4.11% | ||
| LZM - NIKL | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| NICE - NIKL | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| NIC - NIKL | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| S - NIKL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| RDN - NIKL | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
More | ||||