Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs NIKL
BATT vs NIKL Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NIKL
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.22
Change+$0.30 (+2.75%)
Volume$37.77K
Net Assets66.86M
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
Price$13.26
Change+$0.32 (+2.47%)
Volume$7.45K
Net Assets10.52M
BATT vs NIKL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NIKL commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and NIKL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 66.9M vs. NIKL (10.5M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than NIKL: BATT (27.466) vs NIKL (24.507). BATT was incepted earlier than NIKL: BATT (7 years) vs NIKL (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than NIKL (0.75). BATT has a higher turnover NIKL (47.00) vs NIKL (47.00).
| BATT | NIKL | BATT / NIKL | |
| Gain YTD | 27.466 | 24.507 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 66.9M | 10.5M | 637% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 47.00 | 147% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 2.91 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 74% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
More | ||||
NIKL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NIKL and LZM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIKL and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIKL | 100% | +2.47% | ||
| LZM - NIKL | 32% Poorly correlated | +9.52% | ||
| NICE - NIKL | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| NIC - NIKL | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
| RDN - NIKL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| CTM - NIKL | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||