Ad is loading...
BATT vs NIKL
BATT vs NIKL Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs NIKL
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.02
Change-$0.35 (-3.74%)
Volume$192
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
Price$10.64
Change-$0.47 (-4.23%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BATT vs NIKL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. NIKL commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and NIKL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 69.8M vs. NIKL (8.53M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than NIKL: BATT (-11.111) vs NIKL (-19.133). BATT was incepted earlier than NIKL: BATT (7 years) vs NIKL (2 years). NIKL has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | NIKL | BATT / NIKL | |
| Gain YTD | -11.111 | -19.133 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 69.8M | 8.53M | 818% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 55.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 21.02 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -6.99% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| XPEV - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||
NIKL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NIKL and LZM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIKL and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIKL | 100% | -1.42% | ||
| LZM - NIKL | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| NIC - NIKL | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| S - NIKL | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| RDN - NIKL | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| CNC - NIKL | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||