Ad is loading...
BATT vs PICK
BATT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PICK
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.72
Change+$0.26 (+3.07%)
Volume$1.1K
Net Assets55.32M
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$36.64
Change+$0.97 (+2.72%)
Volume$806
Net Assets715.47M
BATT vs PICK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PICK commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and PICK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK has more net assets: 715M vs. BATT (55.3M). PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: PICK (1.943) vs BATT (-3.864). BATT was incepted earlier than PICK: BATT (7 years) vs PICK (13 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover PICK (11.00) vs PICK (11.00).
| BATT | PICK | BATT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | -3.864 | 1.943 | -199% |
| Net Assets | 55.3M | 715M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.39 | 151% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 11.00 | 382% |
| Yield | 3.39 | 3.22 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||