Ad is loading...
BATT vs PICK
BATT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PICK
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change-$0.14 (-1.54%)
Volume$19.96K
Net Assets63.79M
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$36.84
Change-$0.85 (-2.25%)
Volume$331.6K
Net Assets756.22M
BATT vs PICK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PICK commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and PICK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK has more net assets: 756M vs. BATT (63.8M). PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: PICK (5.302) vs BATT (1.932). BATT was incepted earlier than PICK: BATT (7 years) vs PICK (13 years). BATT has a higher turnover PICK (13.00) vs PICK (13.00).
| BATT | PICK | BATT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 1.932 | 5.302 | 36% |
| Net Assets | 63.8M | 756M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 13.00 | 323% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 4.32 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 20 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.52% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 86% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| FCX - PICK | 84% Closely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 83% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| SCCO - PICK | 79% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| HBM - PICK | 76% Closely correlated | -6.70% | ||
More | ||||