BAYZF
Price
$33.49
Change
+$0.95 (+2.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
32.73B
CSPCY
Price
$5.71
Change
+$0.07 (+1.24%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAYZF vs CSPCY

Header iconBAYZF vs CSPCY Comparison
Open Charts BAYZF vs CSPCYBanner chart's image
Bayer A.G
Price$33.49
Change+$0.95 (+2.92%)
Volume$453
Capitalization32.73B
CSPC Pharmaceuticals Group
Price$5.71
Change+$0.07 (+1.24%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization16.38B
BAYZF vs CSPCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAYZF vs. CSPCY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAYZF is a Buy and CSPCY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BAYZF: $33.49 vs. CSPCY: $5.71)
Brand notoriety: BAYZF and CSPCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAYZF: 7% vs. CSPCY: 40%
Market capitalization -- BAYZF: $32.73B vs. CSPCY: $16.38B
BAYZF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $32.73B. CSPCY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $16.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $651.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $90.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAYZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSPCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAYZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CSPCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSPCY is a better buy in the long-term than BAYZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAYZF’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSPCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAYZF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CSPCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAYZF is a better buy in the short-term than CSPCY.

Price Growth

BAYZF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +2.90% price change this week, while CSPCY (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +8.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+1.16% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAYZF($32.7B) has a higher market cap than CSPCY($16.4B). CSPCY YTD gains are higher at: 145.277 vs. BAYZF (69.355). CSPCY (6.96B) and BAYZF (6.84B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BAYZF has higher revenues than CSPCY: BAYZF (46.2B) vs CSPCY (29B).
BAYZFCSPCYBAYZF / CSPCY
Capitalization32.7B16.4B199%
EBITDA6.84B6.96B98%
Gain YTD69.355145.27748%
P/E RatioN/A30.30-
Revenue46.2B29B159%
Total Cash5.5BN/A-
Total Debt40.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAYZF vs CSPCY: Fundamental Ratings
BAYZF
CSPCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
9476
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
864
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9040

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSPCY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAYZF (88). This means that CSPCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAYZF’s over the last 12 months.

CSPCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BAYZF (100). This means that CSPCY’s stock grew similarly to BAYZF’s over the last 12 months.

CSPCY's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BAYZF (94). This means that CSPCY’s stock grew similarly to BAYZF’s over the last 12 months.

CSPCY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BAYZF (49). This means that CSPCY’s stock grew similarly to BAYZF’s over the last 12 months.

CSPCY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAYZF (86). This means that CSPCY’s stock grew significantly faster than BAYZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAYZFCSPCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCSE14.130.17
+1.18%
Franklin Sustainable Intl Eq ETF
IGM119.460.72
+0.61%
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
BANX21.110.05
+0.24%
ArrowMark Financial Corp
TDEC22.72N/A
N/A
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Dec
NVDX15.60-0.90
-5.45%
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF

BAYZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAYZF has been closely correlated with BAYRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAYZF jumps, then BAYRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAYZF
1D Price
Change %
BAYZF100%
+2.92%
BAYRY - BAYZF
88%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
AZN - BAYZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
GIFOF - BAYZF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSPCY - BAYZF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
CHGCY - BAYZF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More

CSPCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSPCY and CHJTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSPCY and CHJTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSPCY
1D Price
Change %
CSPCY100%
+1.24%
CHJTF - CSPCY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSNKY - CSPCY
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
BAYZF - CSPCY
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
DSKYF - CSPCY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
CMOPF - CSPCY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More