BBAJF
Price
$2.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
BQCNF
Price
$120.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

BBAJF vs BQCNF

Header iconBBAJF vs BQCNF Comparison
Open Charts BBAJF vs BQCNFBanner chart's image
Banco Del Bajio
Price$2.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60.01K
CapitalizationN/A
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$120.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BBAJF vs BQCNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
BBAJF vs. BQCNF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBAJF is a Hold and BQCNF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BBAJF: $2.15 vs. BQCNF: $140.00)
Brand notoriety: BBAJF and BQCNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBAJF: 7% vs. BQCNF: 45%
Market capitalization -- BBAJF: $3.62B vs. BQCNF: $9.98B
BBAJF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.62B. BQCNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBAJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBQCNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBAJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BBAJF and BQCNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BBAJF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -10.50% price change this week, while BQCNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQCNF($9.98B) has a higher market cap than BBAJF($3.62B). BQCNF has higher P/E ratio than BBAJF: BQCNF (25.15) vs BBAJF (8.56). BQCNF YTD gains are higher at: 33.206 vs. BBAJF (-36.824). BQCNF has less debt than BBAJF: BQCNF (8.08B) vs BBAJF (44.9B). BBAJF has higher revenues than BQCNF: BBAJF (17.2B) vs BQCNF (1.08B).
BBAJFBQCNFBBAJF / BQCNF
Capitalization3.62B9.98B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-36.82433.206-111%
P/E Ratio8.5625.1534%
Revenue17.2B1.08B1,590%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt44.9B8.08B556%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQCNF: Fundamental Ratings
BQCNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BBAJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBAJF and SOME have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBAJF and SOME's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBAJF
1D Price
Change %
BBAJF100%
N/A
SOME - BBAJF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
MTPOY - BBAJF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQCNF - BBAJF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBH - BBAJF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDORY - BBAJF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been closely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BQCNF
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
EDVR - BQCNF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - BQCNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - BQCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - BQCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More