BBAJF
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.09 (-3.33%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
FSBH
Price
$8.30
Change
-$0.70 (-7.78%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBAJF vs FSBH

Header iconBBAJF vs FSBH Comparison
Open Charts BBAJF vs FSBHBanner chart's image
Banco Del Bajio
Price$2.60
Change-$0.09 (-3.33%)
Volume$223
Capitalization3.62B
FSBH
Price$8.30
Change-$0.70 (-7.78%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BBAJF vs FSBH Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBAJF vs. FSBH commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBAJF is a Hold and FSBH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BBAJF: $2.61 vs. FSBH: $8.30)
Brand notoriety: BBAJF and FSBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBAJF: 6% vs. FSBH: 65%
Market capitalization -- BBAJF: $3.62B vs. FSBH: $0
BBAJF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.62B. FSBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBAJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBAJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSBH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBAJF is a better buy in the long-term than FSBH.

Price Growth

BBAJF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while FSBH (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBAJF YTD gains are higher at: 33.590 vs. FSBH (14.483).
BBAJFFSBHBBAJF / FSBH
Capitalization3.62BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.59014.483232%
P/E Ratio8.56N/A-
Revenue17.2BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt44.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBAJF: Fundamental Ratings
BBAJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDWGX11.830.05
+0.42%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R6
CHDVX13.370.02
+0.15%
Cullen High Dividend Equity I
SOPYX31.80N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy I
WEBAX10.02N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
MPAIX27.18N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage I

BBAJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBAJF and SOME have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBAJF and SOME's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBAJF
1D Price
Change %
BBAJF100%
N/A
SOME - BBAJF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
BQCNF - BBAJF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - BBAJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - BBAJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBH - BBAJF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBH has been loosely correlated with WSSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSBH jumps, then WSSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBH
1D Price
Change %
FSBH100%
N/A
WSSH - FSBH
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GBOOY - FSBH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
BKRKY - FSBH
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
BBAJF - FSBH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCBI - FSBH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More