Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBCA vs EWL
BBCA vs EWL Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EWL
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$87.09
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$169.65K
Net Assets8.82B
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
Price$56.36
Change-$0.22 (-0.39%)
Volume$709.88K
Net Assets1.42B
BBCA vs EWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EWL commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Hold and EWL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 8.82B vs. EWL (1.42B). BBCA (25.030) and EWL (24.944) have matching annual dividend yield . BBCA was incepted earlier than EWL: BBCA (7 years) vs EWL (30 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EWL (0.50). EWL has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EWL | BBCA / EWL | |
| Gain YTD | 25.030 | 24.944 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 8.82B | 1.42B | 620% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.50 | 38% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 6.00 | 50% |
| Yield | 1.90 | 1.85 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| MFC - BBCA | 77% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 77% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| BAM - BBCA | 69% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||
EWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| ALC - EWL | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CFR - EWL | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| ROG - EWL | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| BAER - EWL | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
| LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |