Ad is loading...
BBCA vs EWL
BBCA vs EWL Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EWL
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$72.84
Change-$1.25 (-1.69%)
Volume$183.55K
Net Assets7.88B
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
Price$51.62
Change+$0.33 (+0.64%)
Volume$199.21K
Net Assets1.15B
BBCA vs EWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EWL commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a StrongBuy and EWL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 7.88B vs. EWL (1.15B). EWL has a higher annual dividend yield than BBCA: EWL (11.597) vs BBCA (4.958). BBCA was incepted earlier than EWL: BBCA (7 years) vs EWL (29 years). EWL has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EWL | BBCA / EWL | |
| Gain YTD | 4.958 | 11.597 | 43% |
| Net Assets | 7.88B | 1.15B | 687% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 10.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 2.44 | 2.15 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| BNS - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||
EWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| ALC - EWL | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ROG - EWL | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CFR - EWL | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| BAER - EWL | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.65% | ||
| LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |