Ad is loading...
BBCA vs QAT
BBCA vs QAT Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs QAT
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$73.80
Change+$0.95 (+1.30%)
Volume$166.73K
Net Assets7.62B
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
Price$18.12
Change+$0.22 (+1.23%)
Volume$11.46K
Net Assets79.49M
BBCA vs QAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. QAT commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Buy and QAT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 7.62B vs. QAT (79.5M). BBCA has a higher annual dividend yield than QAT: BBCA (4.856) vs QAT (1.060). BBCA was incepted earlier than QAT: BBCA (7 years) vs QAT (11 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than QAT (0.60). QAT has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | QAT | BBCA / QAT | |
| Gain YTD | 4.856 | 1.060 | 458% |
| Net Assets | 7.62B | 79.5M | 9,584% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.60 | 32% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 27.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 2.30 | 5.89 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | QAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| BAM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| BNS - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
QAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QAT | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| MARK - QAT | 14% Poorly correlated | -10.40% | ||
| ABL - QAT | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A |