Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBCA vs QAT
BBCA vs QAT Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs QAT
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$79.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$165
Net Assets8.23B
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
Price$18.90
Change-$0.18 (-0.94%)
Volume$105
Net Assets84.14M
BBCA vs QAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. QAT commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Hold and QAT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 8.23B vs. QAT (84.1M). BBCA has a higher annual dividend yield than QAT: BBCA (12.670) vs QAT (6.414). BBCA was incepted earlier than QAT: BBCA (7 years) vs QAT (11 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than QAT (0.60). QAT has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | QAT | BBCA / QAT | |
| Gain YTD | 12.670 | 6.414 | 198% |
| Net Assets | 8.23B | 84.1M | 9,791% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.60 | 32% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 27.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 5.67 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | QAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| BNS - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| CM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||
QAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QAT | 100% | +1.49% | ||
| MARK - QAT | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
| ABL - QAT | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.39% |