It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBGI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMMS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BBGI (@Broadcasting) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while EMMS (@Broadcasting) price change was -23.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8673629.00%.
BBGI is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2024.
EMMS is expected to report earnings on Jan 09, 2025.
Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
BBGI | EMMS | BBGI / EMMS | |
Capitalization | 16.1M | 30.1M | 53% |
EBITDA | 35M | -29.16M | -120% |
Gain YTD | -47.608 | -39.000 | 122% |
P/E Ratio | 4.89 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 239M | 39.7M | 602% |
Total Cash | 27.8M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 303M | 65.5M | 463% |
BBGI | EMMS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 16 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMMS's Valuation (44) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as BBGI (50). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to BBGI’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as BBGI (100). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to BBGI’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's SMR Rating (19) in the Broadcasting industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBGI (90). This means that EMMS’s stock grew significantly faster than BBGI’s over the last 12 months.
BBGI's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as EMMS (90). This means that BBGI’s stock grew similarly to EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
BBGI's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as EMMS (93). This means that BBGI’s stock grew similarly to EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
BBGI | EMMS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago47% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago44% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago84% | 5 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JQUA | 57.99 | 0.63 | +1.10% |
JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF | |||
NAPR | 50.45 | 0.21 | +0.43% |
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr | |||
LTPZ | 52.44 | 0.12 | +0.23% |
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS ETF | |||
FXC | 68.09 | 0.11 | +0.16% |
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar | |||
SMI | 45.94 | -0.37 | -0.80% |
VanEck HIP Sustainable Muni ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BBGI and IHRT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBGI and IHRT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBGI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBGI | 100% | +2.45% | ||
IHRT - BBGI | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
SSP - BBGI | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
RGLXY - BBGI | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CMLS - BBGI | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
FUBO - BBGI | 13% Poorly correlated | +5.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMMS and SALM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMMS and SALM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EMMS | 100% | N/A | ||
SALM - EMMS | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.36% | ||
CMLS - EMMS | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
SGA - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GTN - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
BBGI - EMMS | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
More |