BBKCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
39 days until earnings call
CESTY
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

BBKCF vs CESTY

Header iconBBKCF vs CESTY Comparison
Open Charts BBKCF vs CESTYBanner chart's image
BIGG Digital Assets
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$92.45K
CapitalizationN/A
Chinese Estates Holdings
Price$3.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.86K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BBKCF vs CESTY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BBKCF vs. CESTY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBKCF is a Hold and CESTY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BBKCF: $0.11 vs. CESTY: $3.50)
Brand notoriety: BBKCF and CESTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBKCF: 204% vs. CESTY: 332%
Market capitalization -- BBKCF: $69.34M vs. CESTY: $540.68M
BBKCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $69.34M. CESTY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $540.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBKCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCESTY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBKCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CESTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESTY is a better buy in the long-term than BBKCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBKCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BBKCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BBKCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while CESTY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBKCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.30% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CESTY($541M) has a higher market cap than BBKCF($69.3M). CESTY YTD gains are higher at: -8.377 vs. BBKCF (-57.843). BBKCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -13.89M vs. CESTY (-3.26B). CESTY has more cash in the bank: 3.45B vs. BBKCF (3.58M). BBKCF has less debt than CESTY: BBKCF (29K) vs CESTY (5.52B). CESTY has higher revenues than BBKCF: CESTY (1.3B) vs BBKCF (6.49M).
BBKCFCESTYBBKCF / CESTY
Capitalization69.3M541M13%
EBITDA-13.89M-3.26B0%
Gain YTD-57.843-8.377691%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue6.49M1.3B0%
Total Cash3.58M3.45B0%
Total Debt29K5.52B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBKCF vs CESTY: Fundamental Ratings
BBKCF
CESTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9069
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESTY's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBKCF (96). This means that CESTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBKCF’s over the last 12 months.

BBKCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CESTY (100). This means that BBKCF’s stock grew similarly to CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

BBKCF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CESTY (94). This means that BBKCF’s stock grew similarly to CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

CESTY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BBKCF (61). This means that CESTY’s stock grew similarly to BBKCF’s over the last 12 months.

CESTY's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BBKCF (90). This means that CESTY’s stock grew similarly to BBKCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBKCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BBKCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBKCF has been loosely correlated with DMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBKCF jumps, then DMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBKCF
1D Price
Change %
BBKCF100%
+0.23%
DMGGF - BBKCF
52%
Loosely correlated
-5.72%
HIVE - BBKCF
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.35%
RIOT - BBKCF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
MARA - BBKCF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
BITF - BBKCF
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
More

CESTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CESTY and FDS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CESTY and FDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESTY
1D Price
Change %
CESTY100%
N/A
FDS - CESTY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
FUTU - CESTY
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.82%
CCORF - CESTY
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
BOMXF - CESTY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
BBKCF - CESTY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More