BBOE
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.02 (+2.94%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
364.5K
MSSUF
Price
$10.05
Change
-$1.84 (-15.48%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBOE vs MSSUF

Header iconBBOE vs MSSUF Comparison
Open Charts BBOE vs MSSUFBanner chart's image
Black Box Entertainment
Price$0.70
Change+$0.02 (+2.94%)
Volume$200
Capitalization364.5K
Metal Sky Star Acquisition
Price$10.05
Change-$1.84 (-15.48%)
Volume$198
CapitalizationN/A
BBOE vs MSSUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBOE vs. MSSUF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBOE is a StrongBuy and MSSUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BBOE: $0.70 vs. MSSUF: $10.05)
Brand notoriety: BBOE and MSSUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBOE: 52% vs. MSSUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BBOE: $364.5K vs. MSSUF: $0
BBOE [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $364.5K. MSSUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBOE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSSUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBOE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSSUF is a better buy in the long-term than BBOE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBOE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSSUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBOE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MSSUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BBOE and MSSUF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BBOE (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +7.48% price change this week, while MSSUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSSUF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.88% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSUF YTD gains are higher at: -14.758 vs. BBOE (-58.706). BBOE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -88.81K vs. MSSUF (-598.33K). BBOE has less debt than MSSUF: BBOE (1.69M) vs MSSUF (2.13M). BBOE has higher revenues than MSSUF: BBOE (3.69M) vs MSSUF (0).
BBOEMSSUFBBOE / MSSUF
Capitalization365KN/A-
EBITDA-88.81K-598.33K15%
Gain YTD-58.706-14.758398%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.69M0-
Total Cash79.9KN/A-
Total Debt1.69M2.13M79%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBOE: Fundamental Ratings
BBOE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBOEMSSUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FATBP2.820.08
+2.92%
FAT Brands
SITE132.761.51
+1.15%
SiteOne Landscape Supply
NVTS8.79-0.19
-2.12%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp
MOFG28.00-1.18
-4.04%
MidWestOne Financial Gp
AIRT22.70-1.60
-6.58%
Air T

BBOE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBOE and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBOE and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBOE
1D Price
Change %
BBOE100%
+3.31%
SLAMF - BBOE
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INOQ - BBOE
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - BBOE
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSUF - BBOE
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVIIU - BBOE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A

MSSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSSUF has been loosely correlated with SREDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSSUF jumps, then SREDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSSUF
1D Price
Change %
MSSUF100%
N/A
SREDF - MSSUF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLMIU - MSSUF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RRACF - MSSUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EMCG - MSSUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMTF - MSSUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More