BBOE
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.35 (-35.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
364.5K
SLAMF
Price
$11.72
Change
-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
438.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBOE vs SLAMF

Header iconBBOE vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts BBOE vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Black Box Entertainment
Price$0.65
Change-$0.35 (-35.00%)
Volume$101
Capitalization364.5K
Slam
Price$11.72
Change-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Volume$9.42K
Capitalization438.8M
BBOE vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBOE vs. SLAMF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBOE is a Hold and SLAMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BBOE: $0.65 vs. SLAMF: $11.72)
Brand notoriety: BBOE and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBOE: 19% vs. SLAMF: 43%
Market capitalization -- BBOE: $364.5K vs. SLAMF: $438.8M
BBOE [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $364.5K. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $438.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBOE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBOE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the long-term than BBOE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBOE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BBOE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BBOE (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -34.68% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLAMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($439M) has a higher market cap than BBOE($365K). SLAMF YTD gains are higher at: 3.260 vs. BBOE (-61.579). BBOE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -88.81K vs. SLAMF (-3.36M). BBOE has more cash in the bank: 79.9K vs. SLAMF (3.34K). BBOE has less debt than SLAMF: BBOE (1.69M) vs SLAMF (10.2M). BBOE has higher revenues than SLAMF: BBOE (3.69M) vs SLAMF (0).
BBOESLAMFBBOE / SLAMF
Capitalization365K439M0%
EBITDA-88.81K-3.36M3%
Gain YTD-61.5793.260-1,889%
P/E RatioN/A65.00-
Revenue3.69M0-
Total Cash79.9K3.34K2,394%
Total Debt1.69M10.2M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBOE: Fundamental Ratings
BBOE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBOESLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CADPX21.61N/A
N/A
Columbia International Div Inc Inst2
BMISX7.31N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Income Stock C
TSMNX15.45N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq I
NSFJX13.50N/A
N/A
Natixis Target Retirement 2045 N
TREPX15.65N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq Premier

BBOE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBOE and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBOE and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBOE
1D Price
Change %
BBOE100%
N/A
SLAMF - BBOE
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INOQ - BBOE
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - BBOE
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSUF - BBOE
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVIIU - BBOE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with MNTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then MNTN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
MNTN - SLAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
LGYV - SLAMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGR - SLAMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBOE - SLAMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHIC - SLAMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More