BBSRF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
EGMCF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BBSRF vs EGMCF

Header iconBBSRF vs EGMCF Comparison
Open Charts BBSRF vs EGMCFBanner chart's image
Bluestone Resources
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Emergent Metals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$104.46K
CapitalizationN/A
BBSRF vs EGMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBSRF vs. EGMCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSRF is a Hold and EGMCF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BBSRF: $0.22 vs. EGMCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: BBSRF and EGMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBSRF: 6% vs. EGMCF: 34%
Market capitalization -- BBSRF: $31.4M vs. EGMCF: $2.12M
BBSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $31.4M. EGMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBSRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEGMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBSRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EGMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBSRF is a better buy in the long-term than EGMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBSRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EGMCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBSRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EGMCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBSRF is a better buy in the short-term than EGMCF.

Price Growth

BBSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.73% price change this week, while EGMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBSRF($31.4M) has a higher market cap than EGMCF($2.12M). BBSRF YTD gains are higher at: 18.733 vs. EGMCF (-2.108). EGMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -821.16K vs. BBSRF (-17.13M). BBSRF has more cash in the bank: 2.03M vs. EGMCF (710K). EGMCF has less debt than BBSRF: EGMCF (39.8K) vs BBSRF (8M). BBSRF (0) and EGMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BBSRFEGMCFBBSRF / EGMCF
Capitalization31.4M2.12M1,478%
EBITDA-17.13M-821.16K2,085%
Gain YTD18.733-2.108-888%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.03M710K285%
Total Debt8M39.8K20,101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBSRF vs EGMCF: Fundamental Ratings
BBSRF
EGMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBSRF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EGMCF (62). This means that BBSRF’s stock grew similarly to EGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

BBSRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EGMCF (100). This means that BBSRF’s stock grew similarly to EGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

BBSRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as EGMCF (98). This means that BBSRF’s stock grew similarly to EGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

EGMCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BBSRF (45). This means that EGMCF’s stock grew similarly to BBSRF’s over the last 12 months.

EGMCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BBSRF (100). This means that EGMCF’s stock grew similarly to BBSRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBSRFEGMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVEAX15.34N/A
N/A
Ave Maria Focused
JAREX13.62-0.05
-0.37%
Easterly Global Real Estate A
WPSIX54.96-0.35
-0.63%
AB Concentrated Growth I
LMLSX44.51-0.38
-0.85%
ClearBridge Large Cap Value IS
MGRTX41.86-2.09
-4.75%
MFS International Growth R3

BBSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSRF has been loosely correlated with GGLXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBSRF jumps, then GGLXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBSRF
1D Price
Change %
BBSRF100%
-0.80%
GGLXF - BBSRF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GORIF - BBSRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTXXF - BBSRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INCAF - BBSRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EGMCF - BBSRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EGMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EGMCF and LCKYF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EGMCF and LCKYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGMCF
1D Price
Change %
EGMCF100%
N/A
LCKYF - EGMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVTI - EGMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBSRF - EGMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
EREPF - EGMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - EGMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More