BBUC
Price
$33.87
Change
+$0.14 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
BCBNF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.03 (-4.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
62.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUC vs BCBNF

Header iconBBUC vs BCBNF Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs BCBNFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$33.87
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
Volume$65.36K
Capitalization2.38B
Base Carbon
Price$0.58
Change-$0.03 (-4.92%)
Volume$46.9K
Capitalization62.17M
BBUC vs BCBNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBUC vs. BCBNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a StrongBuy and BCBNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BBUC: $33.87 vs. BCBNF: $0.58)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and BCBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 67% vs. BCBNF: 26%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $2.38B vs. BCBNF: $62.17M
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.38B. BCBNF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $62.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BCBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the long-term than BCBNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCBNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BCBNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCBNF is a better buy in the short-term than BBUC.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while BCBNF (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBUC($2.38B) has a higher market cap than BCBNF($62.2M). BCBNF YTD gains are higher at: 92.261 vs. BBUC (40.492). BBUC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 120M vs. BCBNF (-5.02M). BBUC has more cash in the bank: 280M vs. BCBNF (19.5M). BCBNF has less debt than BBUC: BCBNF (52.1K) vs BBUC (9B). BBUC has higher revenues than BCBNF: BBUC (8.24B) vs BCBNF (29M).
BBUCBCBNFBBUC / BCBNF
Capitalization2.38B62.2M3,822%
EBITDA120M-5.02M-2,389%
Gain YTD40.49292.26144%
P/E RatioN/A0.53-
Revenue8.24B29M28,414%
Total Cash280M19.5M1,436%
Total Debt9B52.1K17,276,392%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCBCBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDZNY61.420.45
+0.74%
Sandoz Group AG
HAIIF3.23N/A
N/A
Haitian International Holdings Ltd
HNTIF4.60N/A
N/A
Hunting Group Plc.
NGRC0.03N/A
N/A
National Graphite Corp.
HZRGF0.22N/A
N/A
HAZER GROUP LTD.

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
+0.42%
BN - BBUC
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
PFG - BBUC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
BLK - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
AMP - BBUC
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
STT - BBUC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
More

BCBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCBNF and HCGI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCBNF and HCGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCBNF
1D Price
Change %
BCBNF100%
-4.50%
HCGI - BCBNF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVZ - BCBNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
MGLLF - BCBNF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBUC - BCBNF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
STCGF - BCBNF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More