Ad is loading...
BBUC
Price
$26.54
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
CNS
Price
$100.13
Change
-$0.34 (-0.34%)
Updated
Nov 18, 11:35 AM (EDT)
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BBUC vs CNS

Header iconBBUC vs CNS Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs CNSBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$26.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$42.79K
CapitalizationN/A
Cohen & Steers
Price$100.13
Change-$0.34 (-0.34%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BBUC vs CNS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBUC vs. CNS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a StrongSell and CNS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BBUC: $26.54 vs. CNS: $100.47)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 107% vs. CNS: 58%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $1.73B vs. CNS: $3.7B
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.73B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BBUC and CNS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.56% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNS($3.7B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($1.73B). CNS has higher P/E ratio than BBUC: CNS (28.73) vs BBUC (6.88). CNS YTD gains are higher at: 35.778 vs. BBUC (14.991). BBUC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. CNS (184M). BBUC has more cash in the bank: 787M vs. CNS (265M). CNS has less debt than BBUC: CNS (140M) vs BBUC (9.14B). BBUC has higher revenues than CNS: BBUC (7.68B) vs CNS (490M).
BBUCCNSBBUC / CNS
Capitalization1.73B3.7B47%
EBITDA1.65B184M894%
Gain YTD14.99135.77842%
P/E Ratio6.8828.7324%
Revenue7.68B490M1,568%
Total Cash787M265M297%
Total Debt9.14B140M6,525%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRGRX50.61-0.25
-0.49%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R
MSGUX39.02-0.22
-0.56%
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C
AMBFX36.12-0.32
-0.88%
American Funds American Balanced F2
EVSTX21.57-0.30
-1.37%
Allspring Disciplined US Core C
ETAEX12.61-0.32
-2.47%
Eventide Exponential Technologies A

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
+0.04%
BN - BBUC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
CNS - BBUC
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
JHG - BBUC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
BLK - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
BX - BBUC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More