BBUC
Price
$32.90
Change
-$0.05 (-0.15%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.32B
GBLBF
Price
$87.69
Change
-$0.49 (-0.56%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUC vs GBLBF

Header iconBBUC vs GBLBF Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs GBLBFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$32.90
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization2.32B
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$87.69
Change-$0.49 (-0.56%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.8B
BBUC vs GBLBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBUC vs. GBLBF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a StrongBuy and GBLBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BBUC: $32.95 vs. GBLBF: $87.69)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and GBLBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 399% vs. GBLBF: 217%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $2.32B vs. GBLBF: $10.8B
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.32B. GBLBF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBLBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the long-term than GBLBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBLBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GBLBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBF is a better buy in the short-term than BBUC.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.65% price change this week, while GBLBF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.05% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($2.32B). BBUC YTD gains are higher at: 36.676 vs. GBLBF (29.336). GBLBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 786M vs. BBUC (120M). GBLBF has more cash in the bank: 3.37B vs. BBUC (613M). GBLBF has less debt than BBUC: GBLBF (7.39B) vs BBUC (7.94B). BBUC has higher revenues than GBLBF: BBUC (8.24B) vs GBLBF (6.09B).
BBUCGBLBFBBUC / GBLBF
Capitalization2.32B10.8B21%
EBITDA120M786M15%
Gain YTD36.67629.336125%
P/E RatioN/A316.39-
Revenue8.24B6.09B135%
Total Cash613M3.37B18%
Total Debt7.94B7.39B108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBLBF: Fundamental Ratings
GBLBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCGBLBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMEMX16.71N/A
N/A
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst
FSUVX23.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US LowVolatility Idx
MAIRX10.31N/A
N/A
Victory Trivalent Intl Fd-Core Eq R6
PCMVX16.31N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap Value I A
UMPIX68.02N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraMid Cap Inv

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
-8.34%
BN - BBUC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
PFG - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
BLK - BBUC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
AMP - BBUC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
JHG - BBUC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
More

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
N/A
VRTS - GBLBF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
JHG - GBLBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
AMP - GBLBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
BBUC - GBLBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-8.34%
BN - GBLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
More