BBUC
Price
$32.08
Change
+$0.07 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.73B
GBLBF
Price
$90.00
Change
+$3.00 (+3.45%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
11.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUC vs GBLBF

Header iconBBUC vs GBLBF Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs GBLBFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$32.08
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
Volume$140.82K
Capitalization1.73B
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$90.00
Change+$3.00 (+3.45%)
Volume$216
Capitalization11.08B
BBUC vs GBLBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBUC vs. GBLBF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a Buy and GBLBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BBUC: $32.08 vs. GBLBF: $90.00)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and GBLBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 150% vs. GBLBF: 55%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $1.73B vs. GBLBF: $11.08B
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.73B. GBLBF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGBLBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBF is a better buy in the long-term than BBUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBLBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBLBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBF is a better buy in the short-term than BBUC.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while GBLBF (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBUC is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

GBLBF is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBF($11.1B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($1.73B). GBLBF has higher P/E ratio than BBUC: GBLBF (47.39) vs BBUC (6.88). BBUC (32.830) and GBLBF (32.743) have similar YTD gains . BBUC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. GBLBF (676M). GBLBF has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. BBUC (787M). GBLBF has less debt than BBUC: GBLBF (7.81B) vs BBUC (9.14B). GBLBF has higher revenues than BBUC: GBLBF (9B) vs BBUC (7.68B).
BBUCGBLBFBBUC / GBLBF
Capitalization1.73B11.1B16%
EBITDA1.65B676M243%
Gain YTD32.83032.743100%
P/E Ratio6.8847.3915%
Revenue7.68B9B85%
Total Cash787M3.3B24%
Total Debt9.14B7.81B117%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBLBF: Fundamental Ratings
GBLBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCGBLBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSMY16.750.15
+0.90%
YieldMax TSM Option Inc Strat ETF
FTDS54.690.24
+0.45%
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
JHS11.290.02
+0.18%
John Hancock Income Securities Trust Capital Stock
ISTB48.500.03
+0.06%
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
JIVE71.36N/A
N/A
JPMorgan International Value ETF

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
+0.22%
BN - BBUC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
PFG - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
BLK - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
APAM - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
JHG - BBUC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
N/A
VRTS - GBLBF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.47%
JHG - GBLBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
AMP - GBLBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
BBUC - GBLBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
BN - GBLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More