BBUC
Price
$28.19
Change
-$0.20 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.73B
JHG
Price
$36.15
Change
-$0.88 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.22B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUC vs JHG

Header iconBBUC vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs JHGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$28.19
Change-$0.20 (-0.70%)
Volume$104.7K
Capitalization1.73B
Janus Henderson Group
Price$36.15
Change-$0.88 (-2.38%)
Volume$777.24K
Capitalization5.22B
BBUC vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBUC vs. JHG commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a StrongBuy and JHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BBUC: $28.19 vs. JHG: $36.15)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and JHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 125% vs. JHG: 56%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $1.73B vs. JHG: $5.22B
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.73B. JHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JHG is a better buy in the long-term than BBUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JHG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JHG is a better buy in the short-term than BBUC.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.89% price change this week, while JHG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBUC is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

JHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHG($5.22B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($1.73B). JHG has higher P/E ratio than BBUC: JHG (13.66) vs BBUC (6.88). BBUC YTD gains are higher at: 16.723 vs. JHG (-13.301). BBUC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. JHG (563M). JHG has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. BBUC (787M). JHG has less debt than BBUC: JHG (382M) vs BBUC (9.14B). BBUC has higher revenues than JHG: BBUC (7.68B) vs JHG (2.1B).
BBUCJHGBBUC / JHG
Capitalization1.73B5.22B33%
EBITDA1.65B563M292%
Gain YTD16.723-13.301-126%
P/E Ratio6.8813.6650%
Revenue7.68B2.1B366%
Total Cash787M1.89B42%
Total Debt9.14B382M2,391%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHG: Fundamental Ratings
JHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCJHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBHRX14.50-0.10
-0.68%
Neuberger Berman Equity Income R3
TCAGX8.40-0.11
-1.29%
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl C
FTVFX33.12-0.46
-1.37%
Fidelity Advisor Value M
APGAX98.23-1.65
-1.65%
AB Large Cap Growth A
FIKGX91.21-2.54
-2.71%
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Z

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
-0.70%
BN - BBUC
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
IVZ - BBUC
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.81%
BLK - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
STT - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
JHG - BBUC
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
More

JHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHG
1D Price
Change %
JHG100%
-2.38%
IVZ - JHG
84%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
KKR - JHG
83%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
CG - JHG
82%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
BN - JHG
81%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
BX - JHG
81%
Closely correlated
-3.11%
More