BBUC
Price
$33.87
Change
+$0.14 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
SHNWF
Price
$5.33
Change
+$0.02 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.67B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUC vs SHNWF

Header iconBBUC vs SHNWF Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs SHNWFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$33.87
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
Volume$65.36K
Capitalization2.37B
Schroders
Price$5.33
Change+$0.02 (+0.38%)
Volume$5.87K
Capitalization7.67B
BBUC vs SHNWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBUC vs. SHNWF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a StrongBuy and SHNWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BBUC: $33.87 vs. SHNWF: $5.33)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and SHNWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 68% vs. SHNWF: 169%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $2.37B vs. SHNWF: $7.67B
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.37B. SHNWF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHNWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHNWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the long-term than BBUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHNWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHNWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the short-term than BBUC.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while SHNWF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHNWF($7.67B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($2.37B). BBUC YTD gains are higher at: 40.492 vs. SHNWF (26.905). SHNWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 655M vs. BBUC (120M). SHNWF has more cash in the bank: 7.06B vs. BBUC (280M). SHNWF has less debt than BBUC: SHNWF (588M) vs BBUC (9B). BBUC has higher revenues than SHNWF: BBUC (8.24B) vs SHNWF (3.02B).
BBUCSHNWFBBUC / SHNWF
Capitalization2.37B7.67B31%
EBITDA120M655M18%
Gain YTD40.49226.905151%
P/E RatioN/A17.78-
Revenue8.24B3.02B273%
Total Cash280M7.06B4%
Total Debt9B588M1,531%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCSHNWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FREAX14.660.11
+0.76%
Nuveen Real Estate Securities A
OBEGX34.600.18
+0.52%
Oberweis Global Opportunities Investor
TCRAX59.61-0.13
-0.22%
American Century Growth A
PEOPX63.86-0.19
-0.30%
BNY Mellon S&P 500 Index
KMKNX77.60-1.03
-1.31%
Kinetics Market Opportunities No Load

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
+0.42%
BN - BBUC
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
PFG - BBUC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
BLK - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
AMP - BBUC
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
STT - BBUC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
More

SHNWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHNWF and STT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHNWF and STT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHNWF
1D Price
Change %
SHNWF100%
N/A
STT - SHNWF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
FNCSF - SHNWF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
BAM - SHNWF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
BBUC - SHNWF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
GAMI - SHNWF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More