BBVA vs EFAS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBVA is a Hold and EFAS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBVA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BBVA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBVA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BBVA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BBVA (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.48% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBVA is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (+0.09% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
BBVA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BBVA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% |
EFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAS has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAS jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAS | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| BHP - EFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| RIO - EFAS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| TEF - EFAS | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| BBVA - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| TTE - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||