Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBVSX vs JVMCX
BBVSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts BBVSX vs JVMCX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value
Price$14.78
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.27B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.44B
BBVSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBVSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBVSX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. BBVSX (8.27B). BBVSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: BBVSX (1.19) vs JVMCX (0.00). BBVSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: BBVSX (11 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than BBVSX (0.68). BBVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). BBVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: BBVSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). BBVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.10 vs. JVMCX (-8.54). BBVSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.28 vs. JVMCX (25.73).
| BBVSX | JVMCX | BBVSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.85 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.085 | 6.680 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.27B | 23.4B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.10 | -8.54 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.51 | 9.16 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.28 | 25.73 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.95 | 32.45 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement