Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBVSX vs JVMCX
BBVSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts BBVSX vs JVMCX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value
Price$15.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.57B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.35B
BBVSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBVSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBVSX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. BBVSX (8.57B). BBVSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: BBVSX (1.18) vs JVMCX (0.00). BBVSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: BBVSX (10 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than BBVSX (0.68). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. BBVSX (46.00). BBVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: BBVSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). BBVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.40 vs. JVMCX (-1.02). BBVSX return over 5 years is better than : 54.55 vs. JVMCX (49.23).
| BBVSX | JVMCX | BBVSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.85 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.958 | 11.107 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.57B | 24.3B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.40 | -1.02 | -235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 21.60 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.55 | 49.23 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.09 | 46.05 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers