BCAL
Price
$14.99
Change
+$0.39 (+2.67%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
274.81M
84 days until earnings call
CHBH
Price
$49.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
103.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAL vs CHBH

Header iconBCAL vs CHBH Comparison
Open Charts BCAL vs CHBHBanner chart's image
California Ban
Price$14.99
Change+$0.39 (+2.67%)
Volume$111.77K
Capitalization274.81M
Croghan Bancshares
Price$49.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.95K
Capitalization103.31M
BCAL vs CHBH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAL vs. CHBH commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAL is a Buy and CHBH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BCAL: $14.99 vs. CHBH: $49.75)
Brand notoriety: BCAL and CHBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAL: 79% vs. CHBH: 30%
Market capitalization -- BCAL: $274.81M vs. CHBH: $103.31M
BCAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $274.81M. CHBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $103.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHBH is a better buy in the long-term than BCAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHBH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCAL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CHBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCAL and CHBH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.72% price change this week, while CHBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

CHBH is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCAL($275M) has a higher market cap than CHBH($103M). BCAL has higher P/E ratio than CHBH: BCAL (10.54) vs CHBH (7.61). CHBH YTD gains are higher at: 6.963 vs. BCAL (-9.371). CHBH has less debt than BCAL: CHBH (60.5M) vs BCAL (115M). BCAL has higher revenues than CHBH: BCAL (97.5M) vs CHBH (44.7M).
BCALCHBHBCAL / CHBH
Capitalization275M103M267%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.3716.963-135%
P/E Ratio10.547.61138%
Revenue97.5M44.7M218%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt115M60.5M190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAL vs CHBH: Fundamental Ratings
BCAL
CHBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7695
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4449
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5545
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCAL's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBH (50). This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to CHBH’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBH (49). This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to CHBH’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBH (100). This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to CHBH’s over the last 12 months.

CHBH's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (77). This means that CHBH’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

CHBH's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (55). This means that CHBH’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCALCHBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWLIF0.310.01
+5.00%
AMERIWEST LITHIUM INC
CHBH49.750.65
+1.32%
Croghan Bancshares, Inc.
IPGDF3.00N/A
N/A
IGO Ltd
TAVHY23.75N/A
N/A
Tav Havalimanlari Holding AS
TOELF149.09-2.92
-1.92%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.

BCAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAL
1D Price
Change %
BCAL100%
+2.67%
FNB - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
SHBI - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
CWBC - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ASB - BCAL
78%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
UBSI - BCAL
78%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
More

CHBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHBH and FSRL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHBH and FSRL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBH
1D Price
Change %
CHBH100%
+1.32%
FSRL - CHBH
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
PPLL - CHBH
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMBK - CHBH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSBK - CHBH
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
BCAL - CHBH
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
More