Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCAMX vs FXAIX
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts BCAMX vs FXAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity
Price$71.09
Change+$0.46 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.88M
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCAMX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAMX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. BCAMX (69.9M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than BCAMX: FXAIX (1.26) vs BCAMX (0.36). BCAMX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: BCAMX (13 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). BCAMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). BCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCAMX: FXAIX (0) vs BCAMX (10000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. BCAMX (4.73). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.49 vs. BCAMX (57.21).
| BCAMX | FXAIX | BCAMX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.01 | 6,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.01 | 7,867% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.582 | 1.537 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 634B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.26 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 12.43 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 49.35 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.21 | 100.49 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.92 | 212.02 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement