Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCAMX vs FXAIX
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts BCAMX vs FXAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity
Price$76.47
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.98M
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCAMX vs. FXAIX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAMX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. BCAMX (74M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than BCAMX: FXAIX (1.16) vs BCAMX (0.34). BCAMX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: BCAMX (13 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). BCAMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). BCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCAMX: FXAIX (0) vs BCAMX (10000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.77 vs. BCAMX (8.53). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 114.32 vs. BCAMX (63.81).
| BCAMX | FXAIX | BCAMX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.01 | 6,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.01 | 7,867% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.010 | 13.362 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74M | 696B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.16 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 18.77 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.88 | 78.26 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.81 | 114.32 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.68 | 270.04 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement