Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCAMX vs FXAIX
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts BCAMX vs FXAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity
Price$77.18
Change+$1.02 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.97M
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCAMX vs. FXAIX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAMX is a Buy and FXAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. BCAMX (73M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than BCAMX: FXAIX (1.12) vs BCAMX (0.33). BCAMX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: BCAMX (13 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). BCAMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). BCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCAMX: FXAIX (0) vs BCAMX (10000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.12 vs. BCAMX (5.55). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 102.18 vs. BCAMX (54.12).
| BCAMX | FXAIX | BCAMX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.01 | 6,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.01 | 7,867% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.535 | 12.508 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73M | 723B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.12 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 14.12 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.00 | 91.04 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.12 | 102.18 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.94 | 254.99 | 52% |