Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCAMX vs RWMFX
BCAMX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BCAMX vs RWMFX
Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity
Price$77.18
Change+$1.02 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.97M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.75
Change+$1.02 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.61B
BCAMX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCAMX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAMX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. BCAMX (73M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BCAMX: RWMFX (1.42) vs BCAMX (0.33). BCAMX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BCAMX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). BCAMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BCAMX (17.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCAMX: RWMFX (250) vs BCAMX (10000). BCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. RWMFX (4.28). BCAMX return over 5 years is better than : 54.12 vs. RWMFX (50.82).
| BCAMX | RWMFX | BCAMX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.31 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.31 | 381% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.535 | 9.727 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.42 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 4.28 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.00 | 46.37 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.12 | 50.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.94 | 79.56 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement