BCBNF
Price
$0.38
Change
+$0.04 (+11.76%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
36.55M
IVZ
Price
$13.93
Change
-$0.14 (-1.00%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.41B
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCBNF vs IVZ

Header iconBCBNF vs IVZ Comparison
Open Charts BCBNF vs IVZBanner chart's image
Base Carbon
Price$0.38
Change+$0.04 (+11.76%)
Volume$262.03K
Capitalization36.55M
Inves
Price$13.93
Change-$0.14 (-1.00%)
Volume$6.26M
Capitalization7.41B
BCBNF vs IVZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCBNF vs. IVZ commentary
Apr 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCBNF is a StrongBuy and IVZ is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BCBNF: $0.38 vs. IVZ: $13.93)
Brand notoriety: BCBNF and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCBNF: 221% vs. IVZ: 99%
Market capitalization -- BCBNF: $36.55M vs. IVZ: $7.41B
BCBNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $36.55M. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCBNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCBNF is a better buy in the long-term than IVZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCBNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCBNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCBNF is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

BCBNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +31.49% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.64% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVZ($7.41B) has a higher market cap than BCBNF($36.5M). BCBNF YTD gains are higher at: 25.413 vs. IVZ (-19.412). IVZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. BCBNF (-7.02M). IVZ has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. BCBNF (8.58M). IVZ has higher revenues than BCBNF: IVZ (5.72B) vs BCBNF (0).
BCBNFIVZBCBNF / IVZ
Capitalization36.5M7.41B0%
EBITDA-7.02M1.13B-1%
Gain YTD25.413-19.412-131%
P/E RatioN/A12.27-
Revenue05.72B-
Total Cash8.58M1.93B0%
Total DebtN/A9.05B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCBNFIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACVF42.210.22
+0.52%
American Conservative Values ETF
VGSH58.780.05
+0.09%
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
NUSC37.11-0.05
-0.13%
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
XSHQ37.30-0.14
-0.37%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
DIVY23.72-0.14
-0.61%
Sound Equity Dividend Income ETF

BCBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCBNF and HCGI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCBNF and HCGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCBNF
1D Price
Change %
BCBNF100%
+10.14%
HCGI - BCBNF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVZ - BCBNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
MGLLF - BCBNF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBUC - BCBNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
STCGF - BCBNF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
-1.00%
JHG - IVZ
82%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
AMG - IVZ
79%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
BN - IVZ
77%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
STT - IVZ
74%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
SEIC - IVZ
74%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
More