BCBNF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
36.55M
STCGF
Price
$8.00
Change
+$0.36 (+4.71%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
46.75M
Ad is loading...

BCBNF vs STCGF

Header iconBCBNF vs STCGF Comparison
Open Charts BCBNF vs STCGFBanner chart's image
Base Carbon
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.83K
Capitalization36.55M
STACK CAP GROUP
Price$8.00
Change+$0.36 (+4.71%)
Volume$606
Capitalization46.75M
BCBNF vs STCGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCBNF vs. STCGF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCBNF is a Hold and STCGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BCBNF: $0.30 vs. STCGF: $8.00)
Brand notoriety: BCBNF and STCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCBNF: 24% vs. STCGF: 19%
Market capitalization -- BCBNF: $36.55M vs. STCGF: $46.75M
BCBNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $36.55M. STCGF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $46.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCBNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTCGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCBNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCBNF is a better buy in the long-term than STCGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCBNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STCGF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCBNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STCGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCBNF is a better buy in the short-term than STCGF.

Price Growth

BCBNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while STCGF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STCGF($46.8M) has a higher market cap than BCBNF($36.5M). STCGF YTD gains are higher at: 4.744 vs. BCBNF (-0.858). BCBNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.02M vs. STCGF (-12.23M). STCGF has more cash in the bank: 28.7M vs. BCBNF (8.58M). STCGF has higher revenues than BCBNF: STCGF (1.09M) vs BCBNF (0).
BCBNFSTCGFBCBNF / STCGF
Capitalization36.5M46.8M78%
EBITDA-7.02M-12.23M57%
Gain YTD-0.8584.744-18%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue01.09M-
Total Cash8.58M28.7M30%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCBNFSTCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLDR34.140.35
+1.05%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
VOOV187.681.32
+0.71%
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
FSBD46.200.12
+0.26%
Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond ETF
IBND28.00-0.01
-0.04%
SPDR® Blmbg Intl Corp Bd ETF
FXC67.58-0.31
-0.46%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar

BCBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCBNF and HCGI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCBNF and HCGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCBNF
1D Price
Change %
BCBNF100%
+1.42%
HCGI - BCBNF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVZ - BCBNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
MGLLF - BCBNF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBUC - BCBNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
STCGF - BCBNF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
More

STCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STCGF and BUR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STCGF and BUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STCGF
1D Price
Change %
STCGF100%
+4.74%
BUR - STCGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
BCBNF - STCGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
MONTF - STCGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENDI - STCGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHNWF - STCGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More