BCCEF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.31M
TMRAF
Price
$15.73
Change
+$0.39 (+2.54%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCCEF vs TMRAF

Header iconBCCEF vs TMRAF Comparison
Open Charts BCCEF vs TMRAFBanner chart's image
BacTech Environmental
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization6.31M
Tomra Systems A/S/A
Price$15.73
Change+$0.39 (+2.54%)
Volume$168
Capitalization4.5B
BCCEF vs TMRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCCEF vs. TMRAF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCCEF is a Hold and TMRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BCCEF: $0.03 vs. TMRAF: $15.73)
Brand notoriety: BCCEF and TMRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCCEF: 13% vs. TMRAF: 18%
Market capitalization -- BCCEF: $6.31M vs. TMRAF: $4.5B
BCCEF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $6.31M. TMRAF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $87.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCCEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCCEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCCEF is a better buy in the long-term than TMRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCCEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMRAF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCCEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TMRAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMRAF is a better buy in the short-term than BCCEF.

Price Growth

BCCEF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +4.93% price change this week, while TMRAF (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-0.30% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMRAF($4.5B) has a higher market cap than BCCEF($6.31M). BCCEF YTD gains are higher at: 27.619 vs. TMRAF (22.686). TMRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 271M vs. BCCEF (-509.62K). TMRAF has more cash in the bank: 119M vs. BCCEF (988K). BCCEF has less debt than TMRAF: BCCEF (1.47M) vs TMRAF (611M). TMRAF has higher revenues than BCCEF: TMRAF (1.36B) vs BCCEF (0).
BCCEFTMRAFBCCEF / TMRAF
Capitalization6.31M4.5B0%
EBITDA-509.62K271M-0%
Gain YTD27.61922.686122%
P/E RatioN/A38.04-
Revenue01.36B-
Total Cash988K119M1%
Total Debt1.47M611M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCCEF vs TMRAF: Fundamental Ratings
BCCEF
TMRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8981
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2994
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCCEF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as TMRAF (82). This means that BCCEF’s stock grew similarly to TMRAF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TMRAF (100). This means that BCCEF’s stock grew similarly to TMRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TMRAF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCCEF (100). This means that TMRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCCEF’s over the last 12 months.

TMRAF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BCCEF (64). This means that TMRAF’s stock grew similarly to BCCEF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCEF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMRAF (94). This means that BCCEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCEFTMRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYSAX17.29N/A
N/A
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class A
CCCNX6.71N/A
N/A
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Foc I
EIPIX19.10N/A
N/A
EIP Growth and Income I
CIRFX78.24-0.45
-0.57%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F
BSFIX32.93-0.33
-0.99%
Baron Small Cap Instl

BCCEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCCEF and TMRAY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCCEF and TMRAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCCEF
1D Price
Change %
BCCEF100%
-1.47%
TMRAY - BCCEF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
VEOEF - BCCEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECVY - BCCEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAF - BCCEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTRNF - BCCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
More

TMRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMRAF has been loosely correlated with TMRAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMRAF jumps, then TMRAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMRAF
1D Price
Change %
TMRAF100%
N/A
TMRAY - TMRAF
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.55%
TSPCF - TMRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.74%
VEOEY - TMRAF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
VEOEF - TMRAF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - TMRAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More