Advertisement
BCCMY vs BMCLF
To understand the difference between BAIC Motor Corporation Limited - ADR (BCCMY) vs. BAIC Motor Corporation Limited - Ordinary Shares - Class H (BMCLF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR and Ordinary Shares - Class H
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Ordinary Shares - Class H - The Chinese stock markets have strict restrictions on who can buy and what is available to investors for purchase. Chinese H-shares represent the shares of publicly-traded incorporated Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and trade with a face value of Hong Kong dollars (HKD). Before 2007, H-shares were provided only for foreign investors. Since foreign investors trade H-shares, they have become more liquid in comparison to A-shares which represent publicly listed Chinese companies that trade on the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges in yuan renminbi (CNY). Thus, this resulted in A-shares being traded at a premium to H-shares of a similar company.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCCMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBMCLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BCCMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- BMCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCCMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMCLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCCMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- BMCLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BCCMY (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BMCLF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-4.68% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| BCCMY | BMCLF | BCCMY / BMCLF | |
| Capitalization | 1.99B | 1.96B | 102% |
| EBITDA | 30.3B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.286 | -16.374 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.32 | 17.59 | 98% |
| Revenue | 198B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
BCCMY | BMCLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 24 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCCMY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (4). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.
BCCMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (100). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.
BCCMY's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (75). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.
BMCLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BCCMY (73). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to BCCMY’s over the last 12 months.
BMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BCCMY (5). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to BCCMY’s over the last 12 months.
| BCCMY | BMCLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BRSHX | 13.88 | 0.07 | +0.51% |
| MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq C | |||
| FCPAX | 34.13 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Intl Capl App A | |||
| ALVSX | 11.13 | N/A | N/A |
| American Century Focused Lg Cap Val I | |||
| STMMX | 34.99 | N/A | N/A |
| Sterling Capital Real Estate A | |||
| PGLRX | 18.48 | -0.21 | -1.12% |
| Putnam Focused International Equity R | |||
BCCMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCCMY and AMGDF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCCMY and AMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCCMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCMY | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMGDF - BCCMY | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.88% | ||
| BMCLF - BCCMY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LI - BCCMY | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| BCAUF - BCCMY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SBLX - BCCMY | 0% Poorly correlated | -5.21% | ||
More | ||||