Ad is loading...
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$20.91
Change+$0.14 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. BCEGX (1.28B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.37) vs BCEGX (0.63). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.43 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. BCEGX (-22.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. BCEGX (19.82).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.797 | 1.270 | -220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.37 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.01 | 5.35 | -411% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.17 | 17.29 | -111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.82 | 56.16 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.50 | 60.33 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...