Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$21.85
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. BCEGX (1.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.20) vs BCEGX (0.35). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. BCEGX (-20.97). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. BCEGX (9.88).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.530 | 14.779 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.20 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.97 | 8.11 | -258% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.85 | 43.61 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.88 | 59.28 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.85 | 93.90 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement