Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$20.75
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets934.67M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. BCEGX (935M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.21) vs BCEGX (0.37). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. BCEGX (-25.64). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. BCEGX (-1.69).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.343 | 12.617 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 935M | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.21 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.64 | 5.59 | -459% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.83 | 27.75 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.69 | 51.85 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.77 | 84.46 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers