Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$22.04
Change-$0.05 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BCEGX (1.15B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.26) vs BCEGX (0.41). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. BCEGX (-20.32). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. BCEGX (10.27).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.471 | 11.642 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.26 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.32 | 6.98 | -291% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.81 | 29.24 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.27 | 54.21 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.84 | 91.22 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement