Ad is loading...
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$20.82
Change+$1.26 (+6.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. BCEGX (1.27B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.34) vs BCEGX (0.60). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.43 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. BCEGX (-27.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. BCEGX (16.63).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.460 | -7.697 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 98.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.34 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.55 | -4.43 | 622% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.09 | -0.65 | 4,476% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.63 | 45.42 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.52 | 46.29 | 25% |