Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$21.48
Change+$0.19 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. BCEGX (1.26B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.31) vs BCEGX (0.61). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.43 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. BCEGX (-20.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. BCEGX (10.77).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.364 | 5.919 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.47 | 9.01 | -227% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.97 | 17.82 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.77 | 51.66 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.58 | 70.47 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement