BCEKF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
71.1M
88 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$28.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCEKF vs PAAS

Header iconBCEKF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts BCEKF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Volume$422.01K
Capitalization71.1M
Pan American Silver
Price$28.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Volume$50.68K
Capitalization5.59B
BCEKF vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCEKF vs. PAAS commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEKF is a StrongBuy and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BCEKF: $0.15 vs. PAAS: $28.60)
Brand notoriety: BCEKF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCEKF: 144% vs. PAAS: 275%
Market capitalization -- BCEKF: $71.1M vs. PAAS: $5.59B
BCEKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $71.1M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCEKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCEKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCEKF and PAAS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCEKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.69% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +18.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.31% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than BCEKF($71.1M). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 42.656 vs. BCEKF (-37.632). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. BCEKF (95K). PAAS has higher revenues than BCEKF: PAAS (2.02B) vs BCEKF (85.3M).
BCEKFPAASBCEKF / PAAS
Capitalization71.1M5.59B1%
EBITDA95K296M0%
Gain YTD-37.63242.656-88%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue85.3M2.02B4%
Total Cash9.63MN/A-
Total Debt40MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCEKF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
BCEKF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
9580
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (59) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BCEKF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BCEKF (95) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BCEKF (62) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCEKFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPX61.850.47
+0.77%
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
JHDV34.13N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
FTHY14.41N/A
-0.03%
First Trust High Yield Opportunities 2027 Term Fund
AFMC31.39-0.06
-0.19%
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
FNK49.97-0.23
-0.46%
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX® ETF

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
+2.41%
PAAS - BCEKF
49%
Loosely correlated
+7.56%
AU - BCEKF
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
ISVLF - BCEKF
46%
Loosely correlated
+7.09%
SLVRF - BCEKF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
FNV - BCEKF
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
More