Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs FNWFX
BCEMX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs FNWFX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$29.24
Change+$0.28 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.65M
American Funds New World F3
Price$96.72
Change+$0.66 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
BCEMX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. BCEMX (99.7M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: BCEMX (1.80) vs FNWFX (1.02). BCEMX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: BCEMX (4 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). BCEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: BCEMX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. FNWFX (14.69).
| BCEMX | FNWFX | BCEMX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.57 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.57 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.517 | 25.578 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.7M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.02 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 14.69 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.74 | 59.17 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.52 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement