Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs FNWFX
BCEMX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs FNWFX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$29.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.6M
American Funds New World F3
Price$95.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
BCEMX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BCEMX (101M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: BCEMX (1.72) vs FNWFX (0.99). BCEMX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: BCEMX (4 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). BCEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: BCEMX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.45 vs. FNWFX (19.32).
| BCEMX | FNWFX | BCEMX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.57 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.57 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.424 | 24.098 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.99 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.45 | 19.32 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.36 | 46.41 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 21.08 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement