Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs FNWFX
BCEMX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs FNWFX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$25.91
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.92M
American Funds New World F3
Price$90.02
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.58B
BCEMX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. BCEMX (84.9M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: BCEMX (2.01) vs FNWFX (1.10). BCEMX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: BCEMX (4 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). BCEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: BCEMX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.63 vs. FNWFX (16.27).
| BCEMX | FNWFX | BCEMX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.57 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.57 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.802 | 16.879 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.9M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.10 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.63 | 16.27 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 34.90 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 26.87 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |