Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWAX
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWAX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$25.67
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.7M
American Funds New World R1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. BCEMX (81.7M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BCEMX (2.01) vs RNWAX (0.00). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BCEMX (1.45). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWAX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.00 vs. RNWAX (10.52).
| BCEMX | RNWAX | BCEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.66 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.66 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.576 | 15.958 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.7M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.00 | 10.52 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 37.18 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 27.55 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement