Ad is loading...
BCEMX vs RNWAX
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWAX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$23.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.59M
American Funds New World R1
Price$77.64
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55B
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. BCEMX (71.6M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BCEMX (2.24) vs RNWAX (0.00). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BCEMX (1.45). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWAX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. RNWAX (2.31).
| BCEMX | RNWAX | BCEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.66 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.66 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.995 | 5.446 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.6M | 63.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.79 | 2.31 | 425% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.76 | 24.45 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 32.26 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers