Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWAX
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWAX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$29.24
Change+$0.28 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.65M
American Funds New World R1
Price$91.70
Change+$0.63 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. BCEMX (99.7M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BCEMX (1.80) vs RNWAX (0.00). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BCEMX (1.45). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWAX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. RNWAX (13.32).
| BCEMX | RNWAX | BCEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.66 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.66 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.517 | 24.542 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.7M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 13.32 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.74 | 55.43 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 24.89 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement