Ad is loading...
BCEMX vs RNWHX
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWHX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$20.97
Change-$0.27 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.94M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$72.71
Change-$0.64 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.72B
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 58.7B vs. BCEMX (64.9M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BCEMX (2.26) vs RNWHX (1.12). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. RNWHX (-5.12).
| BCEMX | RNWHX | BCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.72 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.542 | -3.512 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.9M | 58.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 1.12 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -5.12 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.21 | 2.26 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 32.60 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers