Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWHX
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWHX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$29.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.6M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BCEMX (101M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BCEMX (1.72) vs RNWHX (0.90). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.45 vs. RNWHX (19.11).
| BCEMX | RNWHX | BCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.72 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.424 | 23.941 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.90 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.45 | 19.11 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.36 | 45.92 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.32 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement