Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWHX
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWHX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$25.91
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.92M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.58B
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. BCEMX (84.9M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BCEMX (2.01) vs RNWHX (1.00). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.63 vs. RNWHX (16.05).
| BCEMX | RNWHX | BCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.72 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.802 | 16.772 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.9M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.00 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.63 | 16.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 34.44 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 26.08 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement