Ad is loading...
BCEMX vs RNWHX
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWHX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$23.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.59M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$80.42
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55B
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. BCEMX (71.6M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BCEMX (2.24) vs RNWHX (1.10). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. RNWHX (3.35).
| BCEMX | RNWHX | BCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.72 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.995 | 5.788 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.6M | 63.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 1.10 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.79 | 3.35 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.76 | 27.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 37.43 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers