BCG
Price
$1.80
Change
+$0.02 (+1.12%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
29.88M
BRDG
Price
$9.60
Change
-$0.04 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
454.85M
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCG vs BRDG

Header iconBCG vs BRDG Comparison
Open Charts BCG vs BRDGBanner chart's image
Binah Capital Group
Price$1.80
Change+$0.02 (+1.12%)
Volume$2.59K
Capitalization29.88M
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$9.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
Volume$5.86M
Capitalization454.85M
BCG vs BRDG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCG vs. BRDG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCG is a Hold and BRDG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BCG: $1.80 vs. BRDG: $9.60)
Brand notoriety: BCG and BRDG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCG: 15% vs. BRDG: 546%
Market capitalization -- BCG: $29.88M vs. BRDG: $454.85M
BCG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $29.88M. BRDG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $454.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBRDG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the long-term than BCG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRDG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BRDG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the short-term than BCG.

Price Growth

BCG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.16% price change this week, while BRDG (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDG($455M) has a higher market cap than BCG($29.9M). BCG has higher P/E ratio than BRDG: BCG (174.85) vs BRDG (71.62). BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 16.186 vs. BCG (-38.776). BRDG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1M vs. BCG (3.8M). BRDG has more cash in the bank: 87.5M vs. BCG (7.17M). BCG has less debt than BRDG: BCG (27.5M) vs BRDG (450M). BRDG has higher revenues than BCG: BRDG (398M) vs BCG (173M).
BCGBRDGBCG / BRDG
Capitalization29.9M455M7%
EBITDA3.8M39.1M10%
Gain YTD-38.77616.186-240%
P/E Ratio174.8571.62244%
Revenue173M398M43%
Total Cash7.17M87.5M8%
Total Debt27.5M450M6%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCGBRDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRAGX16.300.11
+0.68%
Lord Abbett International Growth R3
FAMRX30.070.05
+0.17%
Fidelity Asset Manager 85%
TMITX11.350.01
+0.09%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth I3
MRGSX24.01-0.02
-0.08%
BlackRock Advantage Global R
TEGAX42.01-0.05
-0.12%
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth A

BCG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCG and SSSS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCG and SSSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCG
1D Price
Change %
BCG100%
+1.12%
SSSS - BCG
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
BRDG - BCG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BENF - BCG
18%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
CCIA - BCG
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
BN - BCG
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
N/A
APO - BRDG
66%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
JHG - BRDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - BRDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
EQH - BRDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CG - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More