BCH
Price
$28.14
Change
+$0.72 (+2.63%)
Updated
Jul 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.23B
Earnings call today
IFS
Price
$36.34
Change
+$0.63 (+1.76%)
Updated
Jul 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.77B
13 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCH vs IFS

Header iconBCH vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BCH vs IFSBanner chart's image
Banco de ChileAmerican
Price$28.14
Change+$0.72 (+2.63%)
Volume$1.76K
Capitalization11.23B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$36.34
Change+$0.63 (+1.76%)
Volume$2.04K
Capitalization2.77B
BCH vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. IFS commentary
Jul 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a Hold and IFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BCH: $28.17 vs. IFS: $36.35)
Brand notoriety: BCH and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 128% vs. IFS: 94%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $11.23B vs. IFS: $2.77B
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.23B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BCH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the short-term than BCH.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.67% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCH($11.2B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). IFS has higher P/E ratio than BCH: IFS (9.76) vs BCH (8.77). BCH YTD gains are higher at: 30.778 vs. IFS (27.862). BCH has higher revenues than IFS: BCH (2.94T) vs IFS (6.82B).
BCHIFSBCH / IFS
Capitalization11.2B2.77B404%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.77827.862110%
P/E Ratio8.779.7690%
Revenue2.94T6.82B43,046%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A10.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5255
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1538
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2342
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as BCH (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (38) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BCH (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (42) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIBRX30.550.02
+0.07%
Thornburg Investment Income Builder R3
AIIEX23.63N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV International Equity A
ITEAX9.60N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Equity Income A
STSVX19.33N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val I
ACIWX13.31N/A
N/A
American Century Global Real Estate G