BCH
Price
$30.39
Change
+$0.73 (+2.46%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.23B
29 days until earnings call
PNFPP
Price
$24.01
Change
-$0.43 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCH vs PNFPP

Header iconBCH vs PNFPP Comparison
Open Charts BCH vs PNFPPBanner chart's image
Banco de ChileAmerican
Price$30.39
Change+$0.73 (+2.46%)
Volume$4.06K
Capitalization11.23B
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$24.01
Change-$0.43 (-1.76%)
Volume$166
CapitalizationN/A
BCH vs PNFPP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. PNFPP commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a StrongBuy and PNFPP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BCH: $29.66 vs. PNFPP: $24.44)
Brand notoriety: BCH and PNFPP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 61% vs. PNFPP: 17%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $11.23B vs. PNFPP: $0
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.23B. PNFPP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PNFPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCH is a better buy in the long-term than PNFPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFPP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNFPP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFPP is a better buy in the short-term than BCH.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while PNFPP (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCH YTD gains are higher at: 41.461 vs. PNFPP (4.413). BCH has higher revenues than PNFPP: BCH (2.94T) vs PNFPP (1.38B).
BCHPNFPPBCH / PNFPP
Capitalization11.2BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.4614.413940%
P/E Ratio8.77N/A-
Revenue2.94T1.38B212,364%
Total CashN/A229M-
Total DebtN/A2.56B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHPNFPP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
23%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OWL19.450.26
+1.35%
Blue Owl Capital
GLAD26.730.33
+1.25%
Gladstone Capital Corp
MNDR1.12-0.01
-0.54%
Mobile-health Network Solutions
KMT22.99-0.28
-1.20%
Kennametal
LEE6.28-0.38
-5.78%
Lee Enterprises

BCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCH
1D Price
Change %
BCH100%
-0.20%
BSAC - BCH
82%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
CIB - BCH
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
BAP - BCH
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
LYG - BCH
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
BSBR - BCH
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

PNFPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFPP has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PNFPP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFPP
1D Price
Change %
PNFPP100%
-0.21%
WAL - PNFPP
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FHN - PNFPP
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
BCH - PNFPP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
NRIM - PNFPP
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
ZION - PNFPP
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
More