Ad is loading...
BCHP vs IWF
BCHP vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts BCHP vs IWF
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
Price$34.32
Change-$0.74 (-2.11%)
Volume$8.46K
Net Assets116M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$404.88
Change-$9.40 (-2.27%)
Volume$1.27M
Net Assets105.31B
BCHP vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCHP vs. IWF commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCHP is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 105B vs. BCHP (116M). BCHP has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: BCHP (0.926) vs IWF (0.822). BCHP was incepted earlier than IWF: BCHP (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF has a higher turnover BCHP (9.00) vs BCHP (9.00).
| BCHP | IWF | BCHP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 0.926 | 0.822 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 116M | 105B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 14.00 | 64% |
| Yield | N/A | 0.58 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BCHP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BCHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCHP and BN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCHP and BN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCHP | 100% | -2.10% | ||
| BN - BCHP | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| V - BCHP | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
| MA - BCHP | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| INTU - BCHP | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| MSFT - BCHP | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||