BCHPY
Price
$5.35
Change
-$0.12 (-2.19%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
307.3M
XFABF
Price
$8.38
Change
+$0.04 (+0.48%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCHPY vs XFABF

Header iconBCHPY vs XFABF Comparison
Open Charts BCHPY vs XFABFBanner chart's image
Brainchip Holdings
Price$5.35
Change-$0.12 (-2.19%)
Volume$14.56K
Capitalization307.3M
X-FAB SILICON FOUNDRIES SE
Price$8.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.48%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.1B
BCHPY vs XFABF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCHPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XFABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCHPY vs. XFABF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCHPY is a Hold and XFABF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BCHPY: $5.35 vs. XFABF: $8.38)
Brand notoriety: BCHPY and XFABF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCHPY: 283% vs. XFABF: 47%
Market capitalization -- BCHPY: $307.3M vs. XFABF: $1.1B
BCHPY [@Semiconductors] is valued at $307.3M. XFABF’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $96.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCHPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXFABF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCHPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XFABF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, XFABF is a better buy in the long-term than BCHPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCHPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XFABF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCHPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XFABF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCHPY and XFABF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCHPY (@Semiconductors) experienced а -2.64% price change this week, while XFABF (@Semiconductors) price change was +9.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

XFABF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.01% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XFABF($1.1B) has a higher market cap than BCHPY($307M). XFABF YTD gains are higher at: 61.154 vs. BCHPY (-45.380). XFABF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 186M vs. BCHPY (-21.61M). XFABF has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. BCHPY (20M). BCHPY has less debt than XFABF: BCHPY (1.17M) vs XFABF (472M). XFABF has higher revenues than BCHPY: XFABF (815M) vs BCHPY (1.32M).
BCHPYXFABFBCHPY / XFABF
Capitalization307M1.1B28%
EBITDA-21.61M186M-12%
Gain YTD-45.38061.154-74%
P/E RatioN/A36.43-
Revenue1.32M815M0%
Total Cash20M155M13%
Total Debt1.17M472M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHPYXFABF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCHPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XFABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSAVX65.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Automotive Port
NMIMX29.97N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Inst
SCPAX11.86N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Disciplined Eq A (SIIT)
JMCEX63.66N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity R2
MSAWX22.58N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp C

BCHPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCHPY has been loosely correlated with BRCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCHPY jumps, then BRCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCHPY
1D Price
Change %
BCHPY100%
-2.19%
BRCHF - BCHPY
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
WBTNF - BCHPY
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
CRDO - BCHPY
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
XFABF - BCHPY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
GFS - BCHPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More

XFABF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XFABF and STM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XFABF and STM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XFABF
1D Price
Change %
XFABF100%
+0.48%
STM - XFABF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
STMEF - XFABF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIXXF - XFABF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
DISPF - XFABF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIIXY - XFABF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
More