Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs EMACX
BCLPX vs EMACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. EMACX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Buy and EMACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.58B vs. EMACX (48.8M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than EMACX: BCLPX (0.70) vs EMACX (0.00). BCLPX was incepted earlier than EMACX: BCLPX (17 years) vs EMACX (24 years). EMACX (2.62) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). EMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 125.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX (1000) and EMACX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. BCLPX (5.22). EMACX return over 5 years is better than : 16.61 vs. BCLPX (7.58).
| BCLPX | EMACX | BCLPX / EMACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 2.62 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.207 | 6.309 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.58B | 48.8M | 9,383% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.22 | 11.40 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.23 | 13.37 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.58 | 16.61 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.73 | 8.89 | -413% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement