Ad is loading...
BCLPX vs HHCAX
BCLPX vs HHCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HHCAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Buy and HHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.46B vs. HHCAX (92.9M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than HHCAX: BCLPX (0.72) vs HHCAX (0.24). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HHCAX: BCLPX (17 years) vs HHCAX (17 years). HHCAX (3.42) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCAX: BCLPX (1000) vs HHCAX (2500). HHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.17 vs. BCLPX (-0.48). HHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.41 vs. BCLPX (5.54).
| BCLPX | HHCAX | BCLPX / HHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.73 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.42 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.841 | -2.436 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.46B | 92.9M | 4,803% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.24 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.48 | 0.17 | -281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.51 | 10.59 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.54 | 15.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.05 | -3.50 | 1,146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...