Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HHCAX
BCLPX vs HHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HHCAX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Hold and HHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. HHCAX (86.5M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than HHCAX: BCLPX (3.50) vs HHCAX (0.23). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HHCAX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HHCAX (17 years). HHCAX (3.42) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCAX: BCLPX (1000) vs HHCAX (2500). HHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.10 vs. BCLPX (5.17). BCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.55 vs. HHCAX (0.53).
| BCLPX | HHCAX | BCLPX / HHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.73 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.42 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.412 | 3.141 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 86.5M | 5,527% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 0.23 | 1,542% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | 6.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.30 | 16.42 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 0.53 | 1,975% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.65 | 1.15 | 926% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement