Ad is loading...
BCLPX vs HHCCX
BCLPX vs HHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HHCCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Buy and HHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.49B vs. HHCCX (94.9M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than HHCCX: BCLPX (0.72) vs HHCCX (0.00). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HHCCX: BCLPX (17 years) vs HHCCX (17 years). HHCCX (4.07) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCCX: BCLPX (1000) vs HHCCX (2500). BCLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.92 vs. HHCCX (0.94). BCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.43 vs. HHCCX (4.23).
| BCLPX | HHCCX | BCLPX / HHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 3.38 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 4.07 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.683 | -1.199 | -140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.49B | 94.9M | 4,732% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 0.94 | 312% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.47 | 10.19 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.43 | 4.23 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.44 | -5.44 | 707% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers