Ad is loading...
BCLPX vs HHCZX
BCLPX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HHCZX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a StrongBuy and HHCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.58B vs. HHCZX (92M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: BCLPX (0.72) vs HHCZX (0.56). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: BCLPX (17 years) vs HHCZX (17 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCZX: BCLPX (1000) vs HHCZX (2500). HHCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.19 vs. BCLPX (1.82). HHCZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. BCLPX (11.30).
| BCLPX | HHCZX | BCLPX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.38 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.07 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.202 | -0.914 | -132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.58B | 92M | 4,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.56 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.82 | 2.19 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.36 | 12.92 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.30 | 33.27 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.90 | 1.96 | -1,933% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...