Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HHCZX
BCLPX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HHCZX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Buy and HHCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. HHCZX (86.5M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: BCLPX (0.69) vs HHCZX (0.55). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HHCZX (17 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCZX: BCLPX (1000) vs HHCZX (2500). HHCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. BCLPX (5.54). BCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.21 vs. HHCZX (4.85).
| BCLPX | HHCZX | BCLPX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.38 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.07 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.783 | 4.689 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.82B | 86.5M | 5,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.55 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | 6.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.00 | 19.31 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.21 | 4.85 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.36 | 5.01 | 207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement