BCLYF
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.29 (-8.12%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
30.97B
BCS
Price
$13.17
Change
-$1.14 (-7.97%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
34.89B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCLYF vs BCS

Header iconBCLYF vs BCS Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs BCSBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$3.27
Change-$0.29 (-8.12%)
Volume$11.12K
Capitalization30.97B
Barclays
Price$13.17
Change-$1.14 (-7.97%)
Volume$21.12M
Capitalization34.89B
BCLYF vs BCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. BCS commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To understand the difference between Barclays plc (BCLYF) vs. Barclays plc - ADR (BCS) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $3.28 vs. BCS: $13.17)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF: Not notable vs. BCS: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 19% vs. BCS: 99%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. BCS: $34.89B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. BCS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $34.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBCS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BCS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCLYF and BCS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the short-term than BCLYF.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -16.03% price change this week, while BCS (@Major Banks) price change was -14.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +57.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +57.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+57.67% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCS($34.9B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). BCS has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: BCS (6.84) vs BCLYF (4.22). BCS YTD gains are higher at: 0.857 vs. BCLYF (-1.057). BCLYF has less debt than BCS: BCLYF (116B) vs BCS (177B). BCS (25.4B) and BCLYF (25.3B) have equivalent revenues.
BCLYFBCSBCLYF / BCS
Capitalization31B34.9B89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.0570.857-123%
P/E Ratio4.226.8462%
Revenue25.3B25.4B100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt116B177B66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs BCS: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
BCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2718
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3638
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (14) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (27) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (3) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (53) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (38) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFBCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBCC24.83N/A
N/A
Neuberger Brmn Nxt Gnrtn Cnnctd Cnsm ETF
BMAR42.31-2.01
-4.53%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Mar
AAXJ68.89-3.89
-5.34%
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Jpn ETF
EIRL56.23-3.58
-5.99%
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
FWD62.05-4.77
-7.14%
AB Disruptors ETF

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-8.26%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-7.97%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.65%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.63%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.77%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
More